[104] Birender and others Vikas Gupta, IAS and others Coram : Present: PANKAJ JAIN [1] disposed off with a direction to the respondents to decide the advance notice dated 16.10.2024 Admittedly, same stands decided vide order dated 22.01.2025, placed on record as Annexure P correct in the light of facts of the case. [2] compliance of orders passed by Writ Court, petitioners is not to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Contemp of Courts Act but [3] 04.04.2025 ‘R. Sharma' IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-1691 Date of Decision : 04.04.2025 Birender and others versus Vikas Gupta, IAS and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Mr. S.K. Malik, Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Amandeep Joshi, DAG, Haryana. *** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (ORAL) On 19.12.2024, Civil Writ Petition No.34522 of 2024 was disposed off with a direction to the respondents to decide the advance notice dated 16.10.2024 in accordance with law Admittedly, same stands decided vide order dated 22.01.2025, placed on record as Annexure P-2. Counsel however submits that the order is not correct in the light of facts of the case. In case, petitioners have any grievance ance of orders passed by Writ Court, petitioners is not to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Contemp of Courts Act but it lies somewhere else. Dismissed. 04.04.2025 Whether speaking/ reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1691-2025 Date of Decision : 04.04.2025 …Petitioners ….Respondents PANKAJ JAIN for the petitioners. Amandeep Joshi, DAG, Haryana. On 19.12.2024, Civil Writ Petition No.34522 of 2024 was disposed off with a direction to the respondents to decide the advance in accordance with law, expeditiously. Admittedly, same stands decided vide order dated 22.01.2025, placed on Counsel however submits that the order is not In case, petitioners have any grievance qua order passed in ance of orders passed by Writ Court, the remedy before the petitioners is not to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Contemp (PANKAJ JAIN) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No On 19.12.2024, Civil Writ Petition No.34522 of 2024 was disposed off with a direction to the respondents to decide the advance , expeditiously. Admittedly, same stands decided vide order dated 22.01.2025, placed on Counsel however submits that the order is not order passed in the remedy before the petitioners is not to invoke the jurisdiction of this Court under Contempt RAJNEESH SHARMA 2025.04.08 18:31 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document