APHC010521582017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION Between: 1. SMT.BATHINA SAI SRI, TELANGANA.,, W/O.S.J.BHARATH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YRS, OCC: DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COMPUTERS, TELANGANA POLICE ACADEMY, HIMAYAT SAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA. 1. DAKE THOMAS PETER EG DT ANR REP PP, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YRS, R/O VAKATHIPPA, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THOUGH ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD, FOR THE STA Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto allow the Crl.R.C. and set aside the order dated 06.03.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.590 of 2017 in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate, Pithapuram, East Godavari District, which was filed under Sections 309 and 317 of Cr.P.C. seeking adjournmen petitioner and consequently, quash the proceedings against the petitioner herein in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015 as the allegations do not attract the ingredients of alleged offences against her and discharge the petitioner IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 838 OF 2017 SMT.BATHINA SAI SRI, TELANGANA.,, W/O.S.J.BHARATH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YRS, OCC: DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COMPUTERS, TELANGANA POLICE ACADEMY, HIMAYAT SAGAR, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA. ...PETITIONER AND DAKE THOMAS PETER EG DT ANR REP PP, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YRS, R/O VAKATHIPPA, U.KOTHAPALLI MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THOUGH ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD, FOR THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto allow the Crl.R.C. side the order dated 06.03.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.590 of 2017 in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate, Pithapuram, East Godavari District, which was filed under Sections 309 and 317 of Cr.P.C. seeking adjournment and dispense with the appearance of the petitioner and consequently, quash the proceedings against the petitioner herein in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015 as the allegations do not attract the ingredients of alleged offences against her and discharge the petitioner from the above IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3369] THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF OCTOBER THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SMT.BATHINA SAI SRI, TELANGANA.,, W/O.S.J.BHARATH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 36 YRS, OCC: DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COMPUTERS, TELANGANA POLICE ACADEMY, HIMAYAT ...PETITIONER DAKE THOMAS PETER EG DT ANR REP PP, S/O SURYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 50 YRS, R/O VAKATHIPPA, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, THOUGH ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ...RESPONDENT(S): Revision filed under Section 397/401 of CrPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the CriminalRevisionCase, the High Court may be pleased toto allow the Crl.R.C. side the order dated 06.03.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.590 of 2017 in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate, Pithapuram, East Godavari District, which was filed under Sections 309 and t and dispense with the appearance of the petitioner and consequently, quash the proceedings against the petitioner herein in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015 as the allegations do not attract the ingredients from the above case and to pass appropriate order or orders as it deems fit and proper in the circumstance of case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 1359 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant Stay of all further proceedings in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015 on the file of the Hon'ble Judicial First Class Magistrate, Pithapuram, East Godavari District, against the petitioner herein is concerned, in the interest of justice. IA NO: 2 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2087 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders dated 30-03-2017 passed in Crl.RC.MP.No. 1359 of 2017 in Crl.RC.No. 838 of 2017, in the interest of justice, and pass IA NO: 3 OF 2017(CRLRCMP 2521 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to extend the interim orders dated 28.04.2017 passed in Crl.RC.MP.No.1359 of 2017 in Crl.RC.Mp.nO.1329 of 2017 in Crl.RC.MP.No.838 of 2017 in the interest of justice. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G L NAGESWAR RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: This Criminal Revision Case is filed under Sections 397 and 401 of Cr.P.C. aggrieved by the order dated 06.03.2017 passed in Crl.M.P.No.590 of 2017 in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015, on the file of the Judicial I Class Magistrate, Pithapuram, East Godavari District. 2. Heard. Perused the record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the revision petition would become infructuous as proceedings in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015 were quashed as per the orders of this Court. To support the same, the petitioner has placed a copy of the order dated 19.02.2024 passed in P.R.C.No.26 of 2015 on the file of the Judicial I Class Magistrate, Pithapuram, East Godavari District. 4. In view of the above circumstances, this Court feels that the petition would become infructuous. 5. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. ____________________________ JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO Dated: 29.10.2025 TJN 42 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 838 OF 2017 Dated: 29.10.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH : AT AMARAVATI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 838 OF 2017 PROCEEDING SHEET SL. NO. DATE ORDER OFFICE NOTE 05. 29.10.2025 TMR, J The Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. (Vide Separate Order) ______ TMR, J TJN