APHC010281552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 14223/2025 Between: 1. BOYAPATI SRINIVASA APPA RAO, S/O. LATE B. SIVA RAMA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 32-9-15 B, MOGALRAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. 2. BOYAPATI VIJAYA LAKSHMI,, W/O. B.S. APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS, OCC HOUSEWIFE, R/O. D. NO. 32-9-15 B, MOGALRAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. 3. BOYAPATI SRINIVASA SRI KRISHNA,, S/O. B.S. APPA RAO, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O. D. NO. 32-9-15 B, MOGALRAJPURAM, VIJAYAWADA. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARAIT, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, ADMINSTRATION, NTR DISTRICT POLICE COMMISSIONERATE, VIJAYAWADA. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE, SOUTH ZONE, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, SURYARAOPETA POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA. 5. THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, SURYARAOPETA POLICE STATION, VIJAYAWADA. 6. ALAPATI RAJENDRA PRASAD, S/O.SIVA RAMA KRISHNAIAH, AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS, OCC MLC R/O.D. NO. 3-28-4, 2ND LINE, BRUNDAVAN GARDENS, GUNTUR. 7. PINNAMANENI KRISHNA MOHAN, S/O.NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER. AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, PLOT NO. 25, 2ND ROAD. TEACHERS COLONY, GURUNANAKNAGAR, VIJAYAWADA. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction or writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the interference by respondents No. 2 to 5 at the instance of 2 respondent No. 6 and 7 in civil matters in respect of landed property of Ac.5.10 cents in NTS No. 13 of Mogalrajpuram, Vijayawada particularly after the orders passed in Civil Appeal No- 2665- 2666 of 2016, dated 03- 06-2025 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as illegally, arbitrary, malafide, intentional, without authority and consequently direct the respondents No. 2 to 5 not to interfere in civil disputes in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. KOTHAPALLI SAI SRI HARSHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. KALAPALA DOONDI MAHARAJ 2. GP FOR HOME 3. KARUMANCHI INDRANEEL BABU 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, has been filed, by the Petitioners for the following relief: “ ... to issue a writ or order or direction or writ of MANDAMUS, declaring the interference by respondents 2 to 5 at the instance of respondents 6 and 7 in civil matters in respect of landed property of Ac.5.10 cents in NTS No.13 of Mogalrajpuram, Vijayawada particularly after the orders passed in Civil Appeal No- 2665- 2666 of 2016, dated 03-06-2025 by the Hon'ble Supreme Court as illegally, arbitrary, malafide, intentional, without authority and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 5 not to interfere in civil disputes in the interest of justice and pass ...” At the time of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioners sought permission to withdraw the Writ Petition and a letter dated 02.12.2025 is addressed to the Registry to that effect. Permission is accorded. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home is in attendance. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. DR.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Mjl/* 04.12.2025 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No. 14223 of 2025 04.12.2025 Mjl /*