IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 211 Chander Bhan Ankur Thakur, Secretary, Tehsil Ismailabad, Tehsil Pehowa, District Kurukshetra and another CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 11.1.2024 respondent No.2 vide which direction was given to the respondent to release the arrear of pay fixation on promotion under the Person with Disabilities Quota with immediate effect under intimation to office of the Chief Administrator Power of Attorney 16.9.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Chander Singh, Secretary COCP-1803-2025 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP No.1803 of 2025 Date of decision : Chander Bhan Versus Ankur Thakur, Secretary, Market Committee, Ismailabad, Sub Tehsil Ismailabad, Tehsil Pehowa, District Kurukshetra and CORAM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. Yogit Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Devyansh, Advocate for Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Dheerja, Advocate for the respondent. NIDHI GUPTA J. (Oral) Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated .1.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by respondent No.2 vide which direction was given to the respondent to release the arrear of pay fixation on promotion under the Person with Disabilities Quota with immediate effect under intimation to office of the Chief Administrator-respondent No.2. Ms. Dheerja, Advocate has put in appearance and filed Power of Attorney on behalf of respondent as well as Reply dated 16.9.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Chander Singh, Secretary 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1803 of 2025 (O & M) Date of decision :-16.09.2025 …..Petitioner Market Committee, Ismailabad, Sub Tehsil Ismailabad, Tehsil Pehowa, District Kurukshetra and …..Respondents HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Yogit Mehta, Advocate with Mr. Devyansh, Advocate for Mr. Nischal Chetanya Manchanda, Advocate Ms. Dheerja, Advocate for the respondent. Prayer in this petition is for initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondent for not complying the order dated 1) passed by the Chief Administrator- respondent No.2 vide which direction was given to the respondent to release the arrear of pay fixation on promotion under the Person with Disabilities Quota with immediate effect under intimation to the respondent No.2. Ms. Dheerja, Advocate has put in appearance and filed on behalf of respondent as well as Reply dated 16.9.2025 by way of affidavit of Shri Chander Singh, Secretary-cum- VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.18 12.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document Executive behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. The same are taken on record. Copy of the reply is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. present cont 11.1.2024 (Annexure P members of the respondent Committee. permitted to withdraw the present contempt take recourse to the appropriate remedy as per law. made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is petitioner. September Vijay Asija Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No COCP-1803-2025 (O & M) Executive Officer, Market Committee, Ismailabad, Kurukshetra on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. The same are taken on record. Copy of the reply is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent contends that the present contempt petition is not maintainable as the order dated 11.1.2024 (Annexure P-1) is an internal communication between the members of the respondent Committee. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt take recourse to the appropriate remedy as per law. Heard. In view of the facts noted above and the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the libert petitioner. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. September 16, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes / No Whether Reportable Yes / No 2 Officer, Market Committee, Ismailabad, Kurukshetra on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. The same are taken on record. Copy of the reply is supplied to learned counsel for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the respondent contends that the empt petition is not maintainable as the order dated 1) is an internal communication between the Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that he may be permitted to withdraw the present contempt petition with liberty to take recourse to the appropriate remedy as per law. In view of the facts noted above and the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present contempt with the liberty aforesaid to the Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2025.09.18 12.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document