MANU ALIAS MANU B V S/O VIRUPAKSHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
CRL.P/100953/2025 · 2025-05-22
Anant Ramanath Hegde
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4133 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4133 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6291 CRL.P No. 100953 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA
CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 100953 OF 2025 (439(Cr.PC)/483(BNSS))
BETWEEN:
MANU @ MANU B.V. S/O VIRUPAKSHI, AGED: 27 YEARS, OCC: FARMER, R/O: 1ST WAARD, NEAR UCHHARAYANAKATTE RAMSAGAR VILLAGE, KAMPLI TQ. BALLARI DIST. 583132. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. B. ANWAR BASHA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, (THROUGH KAMPLI P.S. BALLARI) REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD- 580001. …RESPONDENT (BY SMT. GIRIJA S. HIREMATH, HCGP)
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 439 OF CR.P.C. (U/SEC. 483 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO ALLOW THIS PETITION AND ENLARGE THE PETITIONER/ACCUSED NO.1 ON REGULAR BAIL IN CRIME NO. 112/2024 REGISTERED BY KAMPLI PS BALLARI FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/SEC. 80(2), 85, 190 OF BNS PENDING TRIAL OF THE SAID CASE, BEFORE THE ADDL.
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC AT HOSAPETE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE.
V N BADIGER Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.04.15 14:46:45 +0530
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:6291 CRL.P No. 100953 of 2025
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA)
Petitioner-accused is in custody. Despite granting sufficient time, counsel for petitioner did not choose to argue the matter on 24.02.2025. A Coordinate Bench of this Court posted the matter on 25.02.2025 for addressing the arguments and again adjourned to 05.03.2025.
2. On 12.03.2025, 25.03.2025 and 04.04.2025, this Court acceded to the request of the counsel for the petitioner. Today counsel for the petitioner again seeks time to address the arguments. Since the counsel for petitioner fails to address the arguments on the merits of the matter, petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE
NAA List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7 CT. GTB