APHC010511532025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2777/2025 Between: 1. CHEKURI GOPALA KRISHNAM RAJU, S/O. SATYA PRASAD RAJU, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.204, EVEREST BLOCK, ADITYA ENCLAVE, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD-500016. 2. 2. CHEKURI GOWTHAM RAJU,, S/O. SATYA PRASADA RAJU AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/O. FLAT NO.204, EVEREST BLOCK, ADITYA ENCLAVE, AMEERPET, HYDERABAD- 500016. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. VELTRI SELVI IAS, DISTRICT COLLECTOR MAGISTRATE, ELURU DISTRICT, ELURU. 2. SRI A BHANU PRATAP I A S, COMMISSIONER, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT 2 3. SRI SAMABSIVA RAO, . TOWN PLANNING OFFICER, ELURU MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, ELURU, ELURU DISTRICT 4. JYNAMPUDI VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA RAJU, S/O. APPALA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, C/O. SSVS MILITARY HOTEL, GNT ROAD, POWERPET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT 5. GUNTURU RAMA RAJU, S/O. RANGA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, C/O. SSVS MILITARY HOTEL, GNT ROAD, POWERPET, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 6. CHEKURI GOPALA KRISHNA APPALA RAJU, S/O. (LATE) SURYANARAYANA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, D.NO.22C1- 47, C/O. SSVS MILITARY HOTEL, ...CONTEMNOR(S): Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to leased to punish the respondents 1 to in terms of Sec. 10, 11 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 for wilful dis-obedience of the Honble Court order passed in Writ Petition No. 19341/2025, dt04.08.2025 by Honble Sri Justice Harinadh Garu and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. B V KRISHNA REDDY Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1. A S C BOSE (SC FOR MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONS AP) The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.2777 OF 2025 ORDER: The learned counsel appearing for the respondent submits that in compliance of the directions of this Court further proceedings have been issued against the unauthorized structure and placed on record the notice dated 17.11.2025 issued under Section 636 of MC Act, 1955. 2. It is also further submits that further action shall be taken against the unauthorized structure by demolishing the deviations in the structure. 3. Recording the submissions, the contempt case is closed. The respondent shall take appropriate action in pursuance of the notice dated 17.11.2025 issued under Section 636 of MC Act, 1955. It is made clear that the statusquo order obtained by the petitioners before the learned trial Court without arraying the Municipality as a party shall not come in the way of the Municipal Authority in taking action. 4. Accordingly, the contempt case is closed. No costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N KGM 71 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CONTEMPT CASE No.2777 of 2025 Dated 21.11.2025 KGM