[2025:RJ-JP:42874] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16013/2025 Arpit Singh S/o Ajay Pal, Aged About 26 Years, Resident Of Flat No. 301 Vardan Mahima Florance Patrakar Colony Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Director General Of Police, Police Director Jaipur Rajasthan. 2. The Commissionrate Cyber Crime, Thiruvallur, Tamil Naidu. 3. The Branch Manager Of Rbl Bank, Branch Situated At Tonk Road Jaipur Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mohit Tantia For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 17/10/2025 1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner seeking the following reliefs: “A. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent bank may kindly be directed to de-freeze the bank account of the petitioner bearing No.308171389833 in respondent No.3 bank; B. By an appropriate writ, order or direction, the respondent bank may kindly be directed to not freeze the bank account of the petitioner in future without prior notice; C. Any other appropriate writ, order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner; and/or D. Writ petition filed by the petitioner may kindly be allowed with costs.” 2. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition [2025:RJ-JP:42874] (2 of 2) [CW-16013/2025] with a direction to the RBL, Tonk Road, Jaipur - respondent to keep the disputed amount (the amount which was transferred illegally in the bank account of the petitioner) frozen and allow the petitioner to make transactions from its bank account from the remaining balance. 3. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent – Bank has not received the information regarding the exact figure of the disputed amount, which the Investigating Officer/Police alleges to be receipt(s) of the offence, the bank shall send a communication to the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, to indicate the amount to be earmarked for lien, while endorsing a copy of the instant order. 4. Upon receipt of such communication/letter, the concerned Investigating Officer/Police shall be under an obligation to apprise the respondent - Bank about the amount to be kept in lien, within a period of seven days of receiving the communication from the respondent - Bank. The respondent – bank shall thereafter do the needful as directed herein above. 5. It is further made clear that in case, the respondent-Bank does not receive any reply from the concerned Investigating Officer/Police, then it shall be duty bound to act in accordance with the instant order. 6. Stay petition as well as all pending application, if any, stand disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J TN/56