Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41323 (CHH)

SMT. RASHMI PANDEY v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WP227/876/2023 · 2025-04-08

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-1- 2025:CGHC:16571 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 876 of 2023 1- Smt. Rashmi Pandey Wd/o Late Shri Arun Pandey Aged About 47 Years R/o Near Nutan Chowk Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, C.G. 2- Anshul Kumar Pandey S/o Late Shri Arun Pandey Aged About 25 Years R/o Near Nutan Chowk Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, C.G. 3- Ankur Pandey S/o Late Shri Arun Pandey Aged About 22 Years R/o Near Nutan Chowk Sarkanda, Bilaspur, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1- State of Chhattisgarh Through District Collector, District Bilaspur, C.G. 2- Nagar Palika Nigam Through Commissioner, Nagar Palika Nigam Bilaspur, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh 3-Additional Tahsildar Tahsil Bilaspur, District- Bilaspur, C.G. 4- Gyanchand Pathak S/o Late Babulal Aged About 50 Years R/o Family Welfare Center Office, Main Road Sarkanda, Tahsil And District Bilaspur, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None For State : Mr. Topi Lal Bareth, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.2 : Mr. Yogesh Netam, Advocate, on behalf of Mr. Harsh Wardhan Agrawal, Advocate For Respondent No.4 : Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, Advocate Digitally signed by NADIM MOHLE -2- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 08.04.2025 1) Mr. Pranjal Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for respondent No.4 would fairly submit that the civil suit has already been concluded on 16.10.2024 and thus, the instant writ petition has become infructuous. 2) Not opposed by the other side. 3) Recording the submission made by Mr. Agrawal, this writ petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge Nadim