Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2025:JHHC:36419 1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
Cont. Case (Civil) No. 1091 of 2025
-- Jagannath Manjhi; aged-74 years, Son of-Late Samray Manjhi Resident of Village-Sitadih, P.O. and P.S.-Angara, Sitadih, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-935102...Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Jharkhand
2. Shri Sudhir Bara, Director, Department of Higher, Technical Education and Skill Development, Government of Jharkhand, Nepal House, P.O. and P.S.-Doranda, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002.
3. Shri Guru Charan Sahu, Registrar, Ranchi University, Ranchi, P.O.- G.O.O., P.S-Kotwali, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001.
...Opposite parties
-- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
-- For the Petitioner(s) : M/s. A. Allam, Sr. Advocate
M/s. Sushmita Kumari, Asfia Sultana,
Faisal Allam, Advocate s For the O.P-State : Mr. Kishore Kr. Singh, S.C.-V For the O.P.-R.U : Mr. Amritanshu Singh, Advocate
-- 04/04.12.2025 As per the order passed by the Writ Court a reasoned order has been passed, copy of which has been produced before this Court; the same is taken on record.
2.
After going through the reasoned order, it appears that no contempt is made out. Accordingly, this contempt application stands disposed of.
3.
It goes without saying that the concerned opposite party shall proceed to give consequential benefit in view of the reasoned order.
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
4rd December, 2025
Jk
Uploaded on
4/12/2025