Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41314 (AP)

KUKKALA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA v. THE STATE OF AP

WP/33313/2025 · 2025-12-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010637542025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 33313/2025 Between: 1. KUKKALA VEERA VENKATA SATYANARAYANA, S/O K. RAMABABU, RESIDENT OF 20/49-7, ULLIPALEM, POTHAPALLI PANCHAYAT KOBBARITHOTA, MACHILIPATNAM NORTH, KRISHNA DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF AP, REP. BY ITS PRL. SE HOME DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, MACHILPATANAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 3. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, BANDUR TALUQ POLICE STATION, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 4. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, MACHILPATANAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 5. THE REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RTA OFFICER, MACHILPATANAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT 6. SRI SIDDIK MVI, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA) OFFICER, MACHILPATANAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 7. SRI SRINIVAS NAYAK MVI, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA) OFFICER, MACHILPATANAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 8. SRI NARAYANA SWAMY MVI, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA) OFFICER, MACHILPATANAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 9. SRI LOKHANADHAM AMVI, REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA) OFFICER, MACHILPATANAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. QS 10. SMT SONY PRIYA AMVI REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY RTA OFFICER, MACHILPATANAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 11. 11. SRI ISMAYIL, AGENT REGIONAL TRANSPORT AUTHORITY (RTA) OFFICER, MACHILPATANAM, KRISHNA DISTRICT. THE ADDRESS FOR THE SERVICE OF NOTICES, PROCESS ON PETITIONER IS THAT OF THEIR COUNSEL ADVOCATES, MR. SIVAR VENATI (12407), OFF HI-WAY TOWER APARTMENTS, FLAT NO.400 MARK VASIREDDY SWEETS, TADEPALLI, GUNTUR DISTRICT - 522 501. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to for the reasons stated above it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondents in not registering the crime pursuant to the Petitioners complaint dated 10.11.2025 against the Respondent no 6 to 11 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to register the crime against the Respondent no 6 to 11 pursuant to the Petitioners complaint and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant interim direction directing the 3rd Respondent to register the crime against the Respondent No. 6 to 11 pursuant to the Petitioner's complaint pending disposal of the above writ petition and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. SIVAPRASAD REDDY VENATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No: 33313 of 2025 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…for the reasons stated above it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue a WRIT OF MANDAMUS or any other appropriate writ order or direction declaring the action of the Respondents in not registering the crime pursuant to the Petitioners complaint dated 10.11.2025 against the Respondent No.6 to 11 as illegal and arbitrary and consequently direct the 3rd Respondent to register the crime against the Respondent no 6 to 11 pursuant to the Petitioners complaint and pass such other order or orders as may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case.…” 2. When the matter is taken up for hearing, Sri Venati Sivaprasad Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks the permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Sri Md.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on behalf of the State is in attendance. 5. In that view, the writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.12.2025 M K K HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Writ Petition No.33313 of 2025 Dated. 04-12-2025 M K K 136