VIJAY SHANKAR LAL SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIA/21039/2016 · 2025-02-17
Ajay Bhanot
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41311 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41311 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:23556
Court No. - 5 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 21039 of 2016 Petitioner :- Vijay Shankar Lal Srivastava Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajeev Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Srivastava Hon'ble Ajay Bhanot,J. Matter is listed under the heading of cases likely to have become infructuous (efflux of time). Matter is taken up in the revised call. Names of the counsel for the petitioner as well as the counsel for the respondent are shown in the cause list. None appears to press the writ petition. It is evident that the petitioner does not have any interest in prosecuting the writ petition, as the writ petition has become infructuous by efflux of time. The writ petition is accordingly dismissed. Order Date :- 18.2.2025 Jaswant Digitally signed by :- JASWANT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad