Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41308 (PAT)

Saurav Kumar @ S.R. Yadav v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./32790/2025 · 2025-05-19

Sunil Dutta Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.32790 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-446 Year-2023 Thana- GANDHIMAIDAN District- Patna ====================================================== Saurav Kumar @ S.R. Yadav, S/O Rajesh Thakur, Resident of Mohalla- Akbalganj, P.S.- Rahui, District- Nalanda ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudish Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Uday Chand Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 19-05-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 446 of 2023 for the offence registered under Sections 341, 323, 504, 354, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner along with two co-accused persons forced the victim to go with them to Marine Drive for making video with them. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner and the informant used to work of making video and when the informant demanded more money from the petitioner for making video reels and the petitioner refused to do so the informant falsely implicated the petitioner in this case. There is Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.32790 of 2025(2) dt.19-05-2025 2/2 no material against the petitioner regarding the misbehave or sexual assault. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. The co- accused Mithun Kumar has already been granted anticipatory bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge- VI, Patna passed in ABP No. 7448 of 224. Petitioner undertakes to cooperate in the investigation and trial of this case. 5. Learned APP opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and submissions of learned counsel for the parties, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court where the case is pending in connection with Gandhi Maidan P.S. Case No. 446 of 2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the B.N.S.S. khushbu/- (Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) U T