Mothukuri Rajeswari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/675/2022 · 2025-10-29
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41297 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41297 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010004422022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 675/2022 Between:
1. MOTHUKURI RAJESWARI,, W/O LATE RAGHAVAIAH, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O H.NO. 2-1-75, GADDALAGUNTAPLAEM, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. ARIGA VEERA PRATHAP,, S/O LATE VENKATA SUBBA RAO, HINDU, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, OCC TEACHER, RIO H.NO. 2-1-87, GADDALAGUNTAPLAEM, ARIGAVARI STREET, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI VILLAGE, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, DISTRICT POLICE OFFICE, ONGOLE. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ONGOLE 1 TOWN POLICE STATION ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. SRI THAMMISETTY SRINIVASULU, S/O SUBBAIAH, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, HINDU, CULTIVATION,
R/O H.NO. 43A, MANGALADRIPURAM, YARAJARLA GRAM PANCHAYAT, ONGOLE MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. T K BASHA VALI Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. M RAMMOHAN The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the
2
respondents No. 2 and 3 in not taking any criminal action against the respondent No. 4 by not registering a criminal case in respect of representations dated 30-11-2021, 03-12-2021 and 18-12-2021 made by the 2nd petitioner is illegal, arbitrary, contrary to law and violation of Article 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the schedule property belongs to the petitioners in the interest of justice.”
2. No representation for the petitioners. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home would submit that the subject matter is civil in nature, no crime has been registered against the petitioners. There is a civil suit pending between the parties and the police are not interfering in the civil disputes. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except due process of law.
There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.10.2025 RSD
3
101 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.675 of 2022 Dt.30.10.2025
RSD