APHC010605002022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 36305/2022 Between: PEDDAKOTLA KESAVA REDDY, S/O. P. KRISHNA MURTHY REDDY, AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.2-162-1, INDIRAMMA COLONY, CHUKKALUR VILLAGE, TADIPATRI MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTHAPURAMU DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, ANANTHAPURAMU, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, TADIPATRI RURAL POLICE STATION, TADIPATRI, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. 5. PEDDAKOTLA SOWMYA, W/O. IDAMAKANTI INDRASENA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O.D.NO.1/136-1, CHUKKALUR VILLAGE, TADIPATRI MANDAL, ANANTAPURAMU DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KRISTAM SAKTHI NIRANJAN GUPTHA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. K SRINIVAS The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the interference of the Respondent No.4 in civil dispute between the petitioner and Respondent No.5 regarding the 2 Registered Partition Deed dated 03.03.2021 vide Document No.4078 of 2021 and insisting the petitioner presence in Police Station as illegal and arbitrary and in violation of Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to not to interfere with the civil dispute between petitioner and Respondent No.5 regarding the Registered Partition Deed dated 03.03.2021 vide Document No.4078 of 2021.” 2. Sri K.Sakthi Niranjan Guptha, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit that a direction may be given to the Police not to interfere with the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.5. 3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, would submit that the Police are not calling the Petitioner to the Police Station, no crime has been registered against the Petitioner and the Police are also not interfering in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.5. 4. In that view, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, Police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the Petitioner and Respondent No.5. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:30.10.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.36305 of 2022 Dt.30.10.2025 Dinesh