Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41293 (KAR)

MR.MOHAMMED SHAHID v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/1069/2023 · 2025-07-28

J M Khazi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28975 CRL.P No. 1069 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1069 OF 2023 (482(Cr.PC) / 528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. MR.MOHAMMED SHAHID S/O SIRAJ AHMED AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS, R/AT NO 33/4, SUNNY VILLA, 1ST FLOOR, VICTORIA ROAD, VICTORIA LAYOUT BENGALURU-560047 AND ALSO RESIDING NO.15/36, PALM GROVE ROAD, 3RD CROSS, VICTORIA LAYOUT, VIVEK NAGAR POST, BENGALURU - 560047 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SYED JAFFER MOHIYUDDIN, ADVOCATE-ABSENT) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY VIVEKNAGAR POLICE STATION, REPRESENTED BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR HIGH COURT BUILDING, BANGALORE - 01. 2. MRS SADIYA TAMEEM W/O MOHAMMED SHAHID AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, R/AT NO 136/7, GRAPE GARDEN Digitally signed by REKHA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28975 CRL.P No. 1069 of 2023 EJIPURA, VIVEKNAGAR BENGALURU-560047 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT.N.AMITHA GIRISH, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRL.P IS FILED U/S.482 CR.P.C BY THE ADVOCATE FOR THE PETITIONER PRAYING TO QUASH THE CHARGE SHEET AND CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE PETITIONER IN C.C.NO.55125/2021 (FIR NO.150/2019) OF VIVEKNAGAR P.S. PENDING ON THE FILE OF THE COURT OF XXIX ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT MAYO HALL BENGALURU CITY FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/S.498-A OF IPC 1860. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI ORAL ORDER No representation for petitioner. 2. No representation for petitioner even in the afternoon session. 3. This matter is of the year 2023. 4. Vide order dated 18.07.2025, a week's time was granted to take steps to issue notice to respondent - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:28975 CRL.P No. 1069 of 2023 No.2, failing which necessary orders would be passed for dismissal of the petition. 5. Despite the same, steps has not been taken. It appears petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. 6. Hence, petition is dismissed for default. Sd/- (J.M.KHAZI) JUDGE RR List No.: 1 Sl No.: 7