Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41293 (CHH)

MEHHATTAR ALIS GHURVA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPC/4723/2025 · 2025-09-03

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:45217 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4723 of 2025 1 - Mehhattar Alis Ghurva S/o Dhansai Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Khedapali, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, P.S. Chhal, District Raigarh, C.G. 2 - Tiharin Bai D/o Dhansai Aged About 68 Years R/o Village Khedapali, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, P.S. Chhal, District Raigarh, C.G. 3 - Chandramani S/o Babulal Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Khedapali, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, P.S. Chhal, District Raigarh, C.G. 4 - Kripavati W/o Mangal Singh Aged About 55 Years R/o Village Khedapali, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, P.S. Chhal, District Raigarh, C.G. 5 - Rambati W/o Maniram Aged About 62 Years R/o Village Khedapali, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, P.S. Chhal, District Raigarh, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary (Revenue And Crises Managenet Dept., Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhavan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, C.G. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chairman, Board Of Revenue, Commissioner Office Bilaspur, Tah. And District Bilaspur, C.G. 3 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Commissioner, Revenue, Bilaspur Div., Tah. And District Bilaspur, C.G. 4 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Collector (Raigarh), Collectorate Building, Raigarh, C.G. VASANT KUMAR Digitally signed by VASANT KUMAR Date: 2025.09.04 17:41:19 +0530 2 5 - Lilaram S/o (Late) Maniram Aged About 45 Years R/o Village Khedapali, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, C.G. 6 - Kartikram S/o (Late) Maniram Aged About 40 Years R/o Village Khedapali, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, C.G. 7 - Ranjeet S/o Bankebihari Aged About 65 Years R/o Village Kudumkela, Tah. Dharamjaigarh, District Raigarh, C.G. ---- Respondents For Petitioners : Ms. Madhunisha Singh, Advocate For State : Ms. Poorva Tiwari, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma Order on Board 04/09/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners contended that she wants to withdraw the instant petition with liberty to file better constituted petition. 2. In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. 3. Registry is directed to return the copy of impugned order to the counsel for the petitioners after retaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge Vasant