PURUSHOTAM VERMA ALIAS PRUSHOTTAM VERMA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./6809/2025 · 2025-12-04
Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41289 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41289 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:36356 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 6809 of 2025
1. Purushotam Verma @ Prushottam Verma aged about 33 years, son of Ramdev Verma @ Ramdeo Verma
2. Narottam Prasad Verma @ Narottam Pd. Verma aged about 38 years, son of Ramdev Verma @ Ramdeo Verma
3. Munna Verma, aged about 28 years, son of Ramdev Verma @ Ramdeo Verma
4. Ramdeo Verma @ Ramdeo Mahto aged about 69 years, son of late Bhukhan Mahto Above S. No. 1 to 4 resident of village Simra, P.O. and P.S. Jasidih, District-Deoghar, Jharkhand ...... … Petitioners
Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioners
:Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Anuradha Sahay, A.P.P. For the Informant : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
04/ 04.12.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State and learned counsel for the informant.
2. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 215/2025, registered under sections 126 (2), 115(2), 117(2), 109, 303(2), 351(2), 352, 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 pending in the Court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and altercation took place due to land dispute. He further submits that allegation is general and omnibus against all the accuse persons and petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 11 of the petition. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail.
4.
Learned counsels for the State and informant oppose the prayer and submits that allegation of assault is there.
5.
Considering that there is case and counter case between the
( 2025:JHHC:36356 )
parties, petitioners have got no criminal antecedent which is disclosed in para 11 of the petition and no significant abnormality was found, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the above named, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned court within three weeks from today and in the event of their surrender / arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000/- (twenty five thousand)each with two sureties of the like amount each, to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Deoghar, in connection with Jasidih P.S. Case No. 215/2025, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of B.N.S.S, 2023.
Dt.04.12.2025
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-