Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41288 (AP)

R SRINIVASA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/34451/2025 · 2025-12-09

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010666132025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] WEDNESDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 34451/2025 Between: 1. R SRINIVASA RAO, S/O.LAKSHMINARAYANA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, R/O. 11-221, CHALLAPALLI VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DISTRICT, A.P.521 126. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, ROADS, BUILDING AND TRANSPORT DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KRISHNA DISTRICT, MACHILIPATNAM, A.P. 4. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, R AND B SUB- DIVISION, AVANIGADDA, KRISHNA DISTRICT. 2 5. THE TAHSILDAR, CHALLAPALLI MANDAL KRISHNA DISTRICT. 6. THE CHALLAPALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, CHALLAPALLI, KRISHNA DISTRICT, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue an appropriate order or direction more particularly, one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in issuing Notice vide R.O.C.No.67 of 2024, dt.10.11.2025, as illegal, improper, arbitrary and violation of Article 14, 19 and 21 of Constitution of India, and set- aside the same, consequently direct the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner, pursuant to the Notice, dt.10.11.2025, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to suspend the Notice vide R.O.C.No.67 of 2024, dt.10.11.2025, issued by the Respondents with a direction to the respondents not to take any coercive steps against the petitioner, pursuant to the Notice, dt.10.11.2025, pending disposal of the above writ petition in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. AKULA VAMSI KRISHNA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 3 3. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following ORDER: Sri Akula Vamsi Krishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to submit explanation to the notice dated 10.11.2025. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn, giving liberty to the petitioner to submit explanation to the notice dated 10.11.2025. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 10.12.2025 ANS 4 276 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 34451/2025 Date: 10.12.2025 ANS