- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36099 WP No. 25710 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS WRIT PETITION NO.25710 OF 2025 (LR) BETWEEN: SRI A. P. PRASANNA S/O. K. PARASAL REDDY AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS R/AT NO.99, 5TH CROSS 24TH MAIN ROAD, HSR LAYOUT BENGALURU – 560 102. …PETITIONER (BY SRI RAMU S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT REVENUE DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU – 560 001. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER DODDABALAPURA SUB-DIVISION D0DDABALAPURA – 561 203. 3. THE TAHSILDAR HOSAKOTE TALUK DODDABALAPURA – 561 203. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI K. P. YOGANNA, A.G.A.) Digitally signed by JUANITA THEJESWINI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36099 WP No. 25710 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER OF THE RESPONDENT-ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DODDABALAPURA SUB-DIVISION, AT ANNEXURE-B IN CASE NO. LRF.SR(H)100/2015-16 DATED 29.02.2020 IN DECLARING SALE DEED NO.HSK-1-11919/2012- 13 DATED 02.03.2013 AS VOID AT ANNEXURE – B AND A AND RESTORE THE REVENUE RECORDS IN THE NAME OF PETITIONER AND LAWFUL TITLE AND POSSESSION IN RESPECT OF THE SCHEDULE PROPERTY AND ETC. THIS WRIT PETITION IS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R DEVDAS ORAL ORDER Learned Additional Government Advocate takes notice for all the respondents. 2. The petitioner is aggrieved by the order of forfeiture dated 29.02.2020 passed by the respondent- Assistant Commissioner invoking the provisions of Section 83 of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961, for violation of the provisions contained in Section 79A and 79B of the Act. 3. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that this is a case where the impugned order of forfeiture has - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36099 WP No. 25710 of 2025 been passed by the Assistant Commissioner without notice to the petitioner. It is further submitted that under similar circumstances, a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in W.P.No.7821/2021 has passed an order dated 16.08.2021 remanding the matter back to the Assistant Commissioner for fresh consideration after affording an opportunity of hearing to the aggrieved person. 4. Learned Additional Government Advocate points out from the impugned order that notice was indeed issued to the petitioner and in spite of notice having been issued, the petitioner did not appear before the Assistant Commissioner. 5. Admittedly, as on the date of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Amendment) Ordinance, 2020, no proceedings were pending before any court/authority. 6. This Court had several occasions to consider such cases, where writ petitions are filed long after the provisions contained in Sections 79A, 79B and 79C were - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36099 WP No. 25710 of 2025 omitted from the statute book in terms of the Karnataka Land Reforms (Second Amendment) Act, 2020. It is the consistent opinion of this Court that if at any rate, the Assistant Commissioner, after forfeiting the land has not disposed of the same in accordance with law then the benefit of the saving clause contained in Section 12 of the Amending Act is required to be given to such petitioners. The Assistant Commissioner is therefore, required to ascertain, whether the declared excess lands or forfeited lands still remain with the State Government or has been granted to third parties. If the lands have been granted to third party, then sub-section(1) of Section 12 of the amending Act will apply to say that the proceedings have reached finality. Or otherwise, sub-section (2) of Section 12 of the Amending Act will apply and all further proceedings shall be declared as abated by the Assistant Commissioner. 7. Having considered the submissions of the learned Counsels and on perusing the judgment of the co-ordinate - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36099 WP No. 25710 of 2025 Bench in W.P.No.7821/2021, this Court finds that facts and circumstances in both these matters are quite similar and therefore, the benefit of the decision of the co- ordinate bench should also enure to the petitioner herein. 8. Accordingly, this Court proceeds to pass the following: ORDER i) The writ petition is disposed of. ii) The matter is remanded back to the respondent-Assistant Commissioner to consider the case of the petitioner including the consequences of the subsequent amendment brought to the provisions of Sections 79-A and 79-B of the Karnataka Land Reforms Act in Karnataka Amendment No.56 of 2020. iii) If revenue entries have been altered pursuant to the impugned order dated - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:36099 WP No. 25710 of 2025 29.02.2020 , the same shall be restored in favour of the petitioner. iv) The petitioner shall appear before the respondent-Assistant Commissioner on 8th October 2025, without waiting for further notice from the Assistant Commissioner. Ordered accordingly. 9. Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within a period of four weeks from today. Sd/- (R DEVDAS) JUDGE DL CT:VC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 48