Bokkula Venkataramaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,
WP/12252/2019 · 2025-11-20
B V L N Chakravarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41281 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41281 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010271032019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3368] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B V L N CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION NO: 12252/2019
Between:
1. BOKKULA VENKATARAMAIAH, S/O LATE GOPAIAH, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 12-11-659, 1ST LANE, RAMIREDDY THOTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. BOKKULA GARUDA DEVI, W/O VENKATARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/O H.NO. 12-11-659, 1ST LANE, RAMIREDDY THOTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, GUNTUR URBAN, GUNTUR. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, KOTHAPET POLICE STATION GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. BOKKULA VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O LATE GOPAIAH, R/O D.NO. 12-11-659, RAMIREDDY THOTA 1ST LANE, GUNTUR-1. 5. BOKKULA BRAHMAM, S/O LATE GOPAIAH, R/O D.NO. 12-11- 659, RAMIREDDY THOTA 1ST LANE, GUNTUR-1. 6. BHAGYA LAKSHMI, W/O MADHU, R/O H.NO. 50-9-702 RAMIREDDY THOTA, 1ST LANE, GUNTUR DISTRICT. A.P.
...RESPONDENT(S):
2
Counsel for the Petitioners:
1. K JOSEPH
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME (AP)
The Court made the following:
3
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N.CHAKRAVARTHI
WRIT PETITION No.12252 OF 2019
O R D E R:
Heard Sri K.Joseph, learned counsel for the writ petitioners and Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 2. Sri R.Mallikarjuna Rao, Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home on written instructions would submit that the respondent No.5 is no more and died on 01.12.2021. Copy of death certificate enclosed to the written instructions submitted to the Court. 3. Learned AGP for Home would further submit that the writ petitioners presented a report to the Superintendent of Police, Guntur District, which was forwarded to the concerned Station House Officer, Kothapet Police Station. Thereupon, the Station House Officer. Kothapet P.S. conducted a detailed enquiry about the allegations in the report, and recorded statements of witnesses and ultimately, enquiry would reveal that the allegations in the report are not true and correct and therefore, no action was taken on the said report, and accordingly, written instructions were filed long ago on 04.09.2019. 4. In the light of the submissions made by learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, learned counsel for the writ petitioners
4 requested to give opportunity to approach the concerned Magistrate for necessary redressal in accordance with law. 5.
Recording the above submissions, the writ petition be disposed of without going into the merits of the case, giving liberty to the writ petitioners to approach the proper forum for necessary redressal in accordance with law. 6. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ______________________________ JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI 21.11.2025
PSK
5
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B.V.L.N. CHAKRAVARTHI
60
WRIT PETITION No:12252 OF 2019
Date: 21.11.2025
W PSK