MAMTA YADAV W/O SH. KRISHAN KUMAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/898/2025 · 2025-01-21
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4128 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4128 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:2838] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 898/2025 Mamta Yadav W/o Sh. Krishan Kumar, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Teacher Colony, Takshila School, Behror, Tehsil Behror, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Chief Secretary, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Department Of Personnel And Training, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
3. Director General Of Police, Anti Corruption Bureau, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mukesh Dudi For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vishnu Dutt Sharma for Mr. Bhuvnesh Sharma, AAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Order 21/01/2025 At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner has relied upon S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18523/2024 titled as Jai Prakash vs. State of Rajasthan & Anr. It is submitted that a considerable period from the date of suspension i.e. 3 years, has been passed and no inquiry is pending against the petitioner. It is further submitted that in this regard, challan has already been filed. Furthermore, it is submitted that petitioner has filed a representation for reinstatement with the respective authorities however no consideration is given qua the
[2025:RJ-JP:2838] (2 of 2) [CW-898/2025] same as per the ratio encapsulated in Ajay Kumar Choudhary vs. Union of India reported in (2015) 7 SCC 291. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances of the instant matter, and the consensus drawn inter-se between the parties, this Court directs respondent No.1/competent authority to consider the representation of petitioner, if filed, within an upper limit of seven days and decide the same thereafter within a period of 30 days by way of speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. In light of above, the present petition is disposed of with aforementioned directions. Pending applications, if any, shall stand
disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J DEEPAK/32