APHC010300192017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3504] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM WRIT PETITION NO: 32984/2017 Between: 1. SRI BRK MURTHY, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST, S/O BASAVESWARA RAO, AGED 55 YEARS, EMPLOYER & PROPRIETOR, M/S MURTHY GAS SALES & SERVICE CENTRE,D.NO.4-4-22, SAI PRIYA COMPLEX, WOODPETA, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST., A.P.STATE ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE ASSISTANT LABOUR OFFICER VISAKHAPATNAM DIST 1 OTHER, ANAKAPALLI, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, A.P.STATE. 2. THE AUTHORITY U/SEC 20 OF THE MINIMUM WAGES ACT, 1948 AND THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue any appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly a writ in the nature of Certiorari under Art.226 of the Constitution of India calling for the records relating and leading to the orders passed in M.W.Case No.10/2013 dt.03-06-2017 on the file of the Authority U/Sec.20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and the Joint Commissioner of Labour, Visakhapatnam and quash the same as arbitrary, illegal and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 41048 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operation of the order dt. 03.06.2017 in M.W.Case No.10/2013 on the file of the Authority U/Sec.20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 and the Joint Commissioner of Labour, Visakhapatnam and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M BALASUBRAHMANYAM Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR (AP) The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: 1. On 20.12. 2015, this Court passed the following order: “No representation for the petitioner. Post next week under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Today also, there is no representation for the petitioner as well as respondents, though the matter is listed under the caption “for dismissal”. 3. In the above circumstances, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, all pending applications shall stand closed. _______________________________ JUSTICE MAHESWARA RAO KUNCHEAM Date: 24.12.2025 PNS