1 2025:CGHC:48266-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 2578 of 2023 Ramnarayan Rajput S/o Late Baisakhu Ram Rajput Aged About 50 Years Caste- Lodhi, R/o Gram Panchayat Badra, Tahsil Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) Present Address- Yadunandan Nagar, Tifra Thana Sirgitti Tahsil And District Bilaspur (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Bhatapara Gramin District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Chandra Kumari Lahre W/o Shri Ram Kumar Lahre R/o Village And Post Bijradih, Thana- Bhatapara Gramin, Tahsil And Vikas Khand Bhatapara, District Balodabazar- Bhatapara (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Maharani Verma W/o Rupendra Verma R/o Village And Po. Nawagaon, Thana- Mungeli, Tahsil And Vikas Khand Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.) 4 - Upendra Verma S/o Prakash Verma R/o Village And Po. Nawagaon, Thana- Mungeli, Tahsil And Vikas Khand Mungeli, District Mungeli (C.G.) 5 - Ved Prakash S/o Sher Singh Rajput R/o Village Devri, Thana MANPREET KAUR Digitally signed by MANPREET KAUR Date: 2025.09.19 19:10:00 +0530 2 Pathariya, Po. Jareli, Tahsil And Vikas Khand Pathariya, District Mungeli (C.G.) 6 - Smt. Sunita Verma W/o Shri Mahendra Singh Verma R/o Village And Po. Kawarakapa, Thana- Nawagarh, Tahsil And Vikas Khand Nawagarh, District Bemetara (C.G.) ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Versha Sharma, Advocate. For Respondent No.1/State : Mr. Swajeet Singh Ubeja, Panel Lawyer. For Respondents : Mr. Shakti Singh Thakur and Ku. Bharti Khunte, holding brief of Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, Advocates. Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Judgment on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice 19.09.2025 1. Heard Ms. Versha Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Swajeet Singh Ubeja, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for respondent No.1/State, Mr. Shakti Singh Thakur and Ku. Bharti Khunte, holding brief of Mr. Vivek Kumar Agrawal, learned counsel appearing for the respective respondents. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief(s): “ अतः माननय न्ययलय से न्ययहितः मा हिनवेदन हि आवेद/ आरोपी हिवेरूद्ध थान भाठापीरो ग्रामाण, 3 जिल बल!दबरो- भाठापीरो छ.ग. द्वारो अपीरोध क्रमा' 0447/2023 अ'तःग(तः धरो 420 भा.द.हिवे. हिनरोस्तः ” हिय न से'ब'ध आदश पीरिरोतः रोन , - पी रो.। 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file afresh stating that in the present matter, charges have already been framed against the petitioner and the same needs to be challenged further. 4. In view of the same, as prayed by learned counsel for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to take recourse to law. 5. Certified copy of the documents annexed in the petition, if any, may be returned back to the counsel for the petitioner after obtaining the photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Manpreet