( 2025:JHHC:36138-DB) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. A (D.B.) No. 1410 of 2025 --------- Vinita Devi @ Vinita Tirkey @ Vinita Devi Tirkey aged about 42 years, daughter of Prabhat Tirkey, Resident of village-Dhorhi, P.O. & P.S.-Kurdeg, District-Simdega … … Appellant Versus The State of Jharkhand … … Respondent --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RONGON MUKHOPADHYAY HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ---------- For the Appellant : Mr. Gaurav, Advocate For the Resp. State : Mr. Anup Pawan Topno, A.P.P. ----------- 03/Dated: 03rd December, 2025 1. Heard Mr. Gaurav, learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. This appeal is directed against the order dated 30.10.2025 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Simdega in B.P. No.131 of 2025 in connection with Kurdeg P.S. No.33 of 2024, whereby and whereunder, the prayer for bail of the appellant has been rejected. 3. It has been alleged that the appellant had taken away the minor daughter of the informant to Delhi on the allurement of providing a job to her. It has further been alleged that the informant wanted the appellant to return back her daughter but she did not abide by the same and in fact the appellant disconnected her phone on several occasions. 4. Submission has been advanced by learned counsel for the appellant that the appellant is in custody since 09.09.2025. It has further been submitted that the victim has been recovered and her statement has been recorded by the Investigating Officer, which finds place at paragraph 95 of the case diary, from which it appears that initially she ( 2025:JHHC:36138-DB) 2 was kept as a domestic help in a house by the appellant but subsequently she developed a contact with one Manoj Kumar Sharma in Jaipur where she shifted and ultimately she had married Manoj Kumar Sharma and at the present moment, she is pregnant. Learned counsel submits that in view of the subsequent development, the appellant deserves to be released on bail. 5. Learned A.P.P. has opposed the prayer for bail of the appellant. 6. On consideration of the statement of the victim recorded at paragraph 95 of the case diary, we, while setting aside the order dated 30.10.2025 passed in B.P. No.131 of 2025 in connection with Kurdeg P.S. No.33 of 2024, direct the appellant be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Simdega 7. This appeal is allowed. (Rongon Mukhopadhyay, J.) (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) 03/12/2025 Pappu/-