CWP-9302-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 148 SUMANT SHARMA HARYANA STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present:- Mr. Mr. Anshul Labana, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA The the respondent to Employees (Security of Service) Act, 2024 2. Learned counsel for the herein is pending for appropriate the petitioner pending representation period. 3. 4. notice on behalf of the respondent representation, dated Haryana State Board of Technical Education order in accordance with law within 2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: SUMANT SHARMA Versus HARYANA STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Mr. R. K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Anshul Labana, Advocate for the petitioner. TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed seeking a writ of the respondent to grant the security of service under Employees (Security of Service) Act, 2024, upto the age of 58 years. Learned counsel for the petitioner herein is pending for appropriate decision before the respondent will be satisfied in case respondent representation, dated 07.02.2025, Annexure P Notice of motion. Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Additional A. G., Haryana ice on behalf of the respondent/State and , dated 07.02.2025, will be decided by Haryana State Board of Technical Education, order in accordance with law within a period of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-9302-2025 Date of Decision: 01.04.2025 …Petitioner(s) HARYANA STATE BOARD OF TECHNICAL EDUCATION …Respondent(s) TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA R. K. Malik, Sr. Advocate with petition has been filed seeking a writ of mandamus directing grant the security of service under the Haryana Contractual , upto the age of 58 years. petitioner submits that grievance raised decision before the respondent. At this stage, respondent is directed to decide the Annexure P-10, in a specified Mr. Krishan K. Chahal, Additional A. G., Haryana, accepts and submits that the pending will be decided by the respondent/Secretary, , by passing a speaking/reasoned a period of three months. directing Haryana Contractual submits that grievance raised . At this stage, the in a specified accepts the pending Secretary, /reasoned Aman Dua 2025.04.02 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document CWP-9302-2025 5. petitioner has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 6. 7. officer concerned shall pay costs of 01.04.2025 Ad 2025 -2- In view of the statement made, lea has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. Ordered accordingly. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the r concerned shall pay costs of ₹50,000 to the petitioner. Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ,000 to the petitioner. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No rned counsel for the In case the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the ) Aman Dua 2025.04.02 18:21 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this judicial document