1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10275 of 2025 1 - Neelmani Sahu S/o Shri Gurucharan Sahu Aged About 41 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Malgaon, District Bastar, C.G. 2 - Sabhajeet Verma S/o Late Ishwar Dev Verma Aged About 46 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Kachnar, District Bastar, C.G. 3 - Dupendra Kashyap S/o Shri Sonadhar Kashyap Aged About 36 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Barda, District Bastar, C.G. 4 - Ramnath Baghel S/o Shri Deenbandhu Baghel Aged About 40 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Karitgaon, District Bastar, C.G. 5 - Ishwar Singh Kashyap S/o Shri Arjun Singh Kashyap Aged About 40 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Rata Khandi, District Bastar, C.G. 6 - Sangram Nag S/o Late Shri Bhanwar Nag Aged About 37 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Cholnar, District Bastar, C.G. 7 - Sunita Kashyap D/o Shri Pankaj Kashyap Aged About 42 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Adawal, District Bastar, C.G. 8 - Ku. Smrita Dubey D/o Shri Jeevandhar Dubey Aged About 50 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Borpadar, District Bastar, C.G. 9 - Smt. Kiran Bajpai W/o Late Anil Bajpai Aged About 49 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Dhodrepal, District Bastar, C.G. 10 - Smt. Shanti Baghel W/o Shri Anantram Baghel Aged About 37 Years Working As Assistant Teacher (L.B.), Govt. Primary School, Bayaguda, District Bastar, C.G. 11 - Munna Ram Nag S/o Bajrang Nag Aged About 50 Years R/o House No. 83, Ward No. 7, Sanvara Para, Mahupal Barai, District Bastar, C.G. ... Petitioner(s) versus SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Digitally signed by SAGRIKA AGRAWAL Date: 2025.09.09 11:28:55 +0530 2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Panchayat And Rural Development Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 3 - The Director Directorate Of Public Instruction, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Raipur, District Raipur, C.G. 4 - The District Education Officer Bastar, District- Bastar, C.G. 5 - The Block Education Officer Bakawand, District- Bastar, C.G. 6 - The Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Bastar, District- Bastar, C.G. 7 - The Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Bakawand, District- Bastar, C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Gaurav Singhal, Advocate For Respondent(s) : Mr. Arvind Verma, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal Order on Board 08/09/2025 1. The claim of the petitioners in the present petition is with regard to grant of 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that with regard to award of the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati Vetanman, some circular has been issued by the respondent/State. Apart from this, Division Bench of this Court in case of “Smt Sona Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh and others” in WA No. 261 of 2023 has also considered the identical issue. The petitioners are also entitled for the 1st and 2nd Kramonnati 3 Vetanman. He further submits that at present, this petition may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioners to make a representation to respondents/ competent authority in light of order passed by this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023. 3. Learned State counsel opposes the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 4. Be that as it may, looking to the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for petitioners, this petition, at this stage, is disposed of permitting the petitioners to make representation raising all grounds as raised in the writ petition to respondents/competent authority annexing all relevant documents, and judgment of this Court passed in WA No. 261 of 2023. On such representation being made, it is expected that the respondents/competent authority shall consider the same in accordance with law, considering the circular(s) issued in this regard, in light of judgment of this Court in WA No. 261 of 2023 within further period of four months from the date of receipt of such representation. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on merits of the case, and it is for respondents/competent authority to consider the claim of petitioners on its own merits. 6. With this observation, the present writ petition stand disposed of. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge sagrika