[2025:RJ-JP:51524] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 20172/2025 Megh Ram Meena S/o Mishri Lal, Aged About 66 Years, R/o Pratap Chowk, Bali, Pali (Raj) At Present R/o Kheri, Karauli, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus Board Of Secondary Education, Ajmer, Rajasthan Through Its Secretary. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kishan Swami with Mr. Vishesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 19/12/2025 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- “It is, therefore, prayed that this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to allow this writ petition and by an appropriate order or direction, the respondents be directed to correct the name of the Petitioner in the Secondary Examination 2022 and Senior Secondary Examination 2024 marksheet of his son Abhishek Meena from “Netram Meena” to “Meghram Meena”. Any other relief which this Hon’ble Court considers just and proper be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Vishesh Gupta, submits that in similar circumstances, this Court in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.18144/2022 titled as Pintu Singh [2025:RJ-JP:51524] (2 of 3) [CW-20172/2025] Vs. Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, decided on 18.08.2025 and in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14096/2019 titled as Trilok Meena Vs. Board of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, decided on 14.07.2025, has granted liberty to the petitioner to approach the authorities and file the desired documents for seeking redressal of his grievance. The operative portion of the order dated 18.08.2025 reads as under:- “5. This Court is not going into the controversy involved in this writ petition whether the required correction can be done at this stage or not, but looking to the fact that before approaching this Court, the petitioner has not submitted any application with the relevant documents before the respondents, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioner to file the desired documents as per the office order dated 26.02.2021 in case, such application/ document is submitted by the petitioner before the respondents within a period of four weeks from today. It is expected from the respondents to decide the said application submitted by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law expeditiously as early as possible, within a period of six weeks thereafter.” 3. In view of the above, the present petition is also decided on similar terms, granting liberty to the petitioner to file the relevant documents along with the application within a period of four weeks from today. On the said application being filed, it is expected from the respondent to decide the said application submitted by the petitioner strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of six weeks thereafter. [2025:RJ-JP:51524] (3 of 3) [CW-20172/2025] 4. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J JAYANT KUMAR /11