-1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI C.M.P. No. 183 of 2025 Ramchandra Prasad Singh, aged about 66 years, Son of Late Ram Briksh Singh, Resident of Sekhpura, Durga Ashram Road, P.O. & P.S. Shastri Nagar, Patna, Bihar-800014. ..... … Petitioner Versus 1. Anita Sinha, aged about 57 years Daughter of Late Birendra Kumar Singh, Wife of Sri Krishna Chandra Singh, Resident of Sekhpura, Durga Ashram Road, P.O. & P.S.-Shastri Nagar, District Patna-800014, Bihar, now permanent resident of Qr. No. H-137, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. & P.S. Argora, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand-834002. 2. Krishna Chandra Singh, Son of Late Ram Briksh Singh, Resident of Qr. No. H-137, Harmu Housing Colony, P.O. & P.S. Argora, District-Ranchi, Jharkhand - 834002. 3. Ajay Kumar Singh, Son of Late Ram Briksh Singh, Resident of Sekhpura, Durga Ashram Road, P.O. & P.S. Shastri Nagar, District-Patna, Bihar- 800014. 4. Bijay Kumar Singh, son of Late Ram Briksh Singh, Sekhpura, Durga Ashram Road, P.O. and P.S. Shastri Nagar, District Patna 800014, Bihar. 5. Sanjay Singh, Son of Late Ram Briksh Singh, Senior Manager, Caterpillar Company, Puria, P.O. and P.S.-Puria, Chicago' (USA), PIN-600007. 6. Sangita Devi, Wife of Sri Ravi Shekhar Prasad Singh, Daughter of Late Ram Briksh Singh, Resident of A.G. Colony, Patna, P.O. & P.S. Shastri Nagar, District Patna, Bihar-800014. 7. Sarita Devi, Wife of Sri Shashikant Ajay, Daughter of Late Ram Briksh Singh, Resident of C/o Dr. Shashikant Ajay, Near Karpuri Bhawan, Sekhpura, Durga Ashram Road, P.O. & P.S. Shastri Nagar, District Patna, Bihar. 8. General Public of the Locality of Village Daladali, P.O. and P.S. Ratu (now Nagri), District Ranchi. ..... … Opposite Parties -2- -------- CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajeev Ranjan Tiwari, Advocate. For the O.P. No. 1 : Mr. Prashant Pallav, Advocate. : Ms. Shivani Jaluka, Advocate. ------ 04/ 03.03.2025 This petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India for quashing of the order dated 23.12.2024, passed in L.A. Case No. 04 of 2018 by the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner-XX, Ranchi, whereby, the petition filed under Order- XXVI, Rule-4 read with Section 151 of the CPC has been dismissed by the learned court. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the said petition was filed for examining the petitioner-defendant on pleader commissioner, however, the same has been rejected. He submits that today he has been instructed that the petitioner will close his evidence within two weeks with effect from 24.03.2025 including himself. He submits that this petition may kindly be disposed of. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the O.P. No. 1, who is the plaintiff and contesting party submits that on the undertaking of the petitioner, this petition may kindly be disposed of. 4. Considering that the undertaking has been given by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that within two weeks with effect from 24.03.2025, the entire evidence including the petitioner will be concluded before the learned court concerned and in view of that this petition is being disposed of directing the petitioner to conclude the evidence including himself starting with effect from 24.03.2025 and close by 09.04.2025. 5. With the above observation, this petition is disposed of. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Amitesh/-