M/s. Bhagam Constructions Pvt.Ltd., v. Sri. Budithi Rajasekhar, IAS,
CC/290/2024 · 2025-04-24
Ravi Cheemalapati
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4125 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4125 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010027952024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: Between: M/s. Bhagam Constructions Pvt.ltd., Sri Budithi Rajasekhar Ias and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
1. NAGARAJU NAGURU
2. KIRAN KUMAR VADLAMUDI
3. C SUMON The Court made the following: ORDER This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 09.10.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition vide W.P.No.25716 of 2023.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 290/2024 M/s. Bhagam Constructions Pvt.ltd., ...PETITIONER AND Sri Budithi Rajasekhar Ias and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
SURESH KUMAR REDDY KALAVA Counsel for the Contemnor(S):
NAGARAJU NAGURU VADLAMUDI The Court made the following: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 09.10.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition vide W.P.No.25716 of 2023.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF APRIL THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...CONTEMNOR(S) This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act alleging willful disobedience of the orders dated 09.10.2023 passed
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order, disobedience of which is complained of in this contempt case, had been complied with.
3. In view the above submission, nothing remains for adjudication and this Contempt Case can be closed.
4. Accordingly, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR