Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41246 (CHH)

GOVENDRA KUMAR SINGH v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/10511/2025 · 2025-09-16

Shri Narendra Kumar Vyas

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:CGHC:47684 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 10511 of 2025 1 - Govendra Kumar Singh S/o Shri Lal Umrao Singh Aged About 61 Years Currently Working As Tracer (Civil) In The Public Work Department R/o Choukhadiyapara, Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Public Works Department Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa - Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Chief Engineer Public Work Department North Block Nirman Bhawan Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Executive Engineer Public Work Department Division Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 4 - Superintending Engineer District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Aniruddha Shrivastava, Advocate For State : Mr. Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas Order on Board 17.09.2025 1. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking direction to the respondents to consider his case for promotion. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner is working as Tracer since appointment and his service is due for retirement on 30th September, 2025. He would further submit that as evident from Annexure P/10 the process for convening of DPC is going on for promotion to the post of Assistant Draftsman to the petitioner, therefore, it is prayed that an early promotion order be released to extend benefit of promotion to the petitioner. 3. Considering the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, it is directed to the respondents that they shall consider the case of the petitioner for promotion and while considering his case for promotion, his superannuation should not come in the way to deprive him the benefit of promotion, if he was otherwise deserved to be considered for promotion. 4. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the writ petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge Deshmukh KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Digitally signed by KISHORE KUMAR DESHMUKH Date: 2025.09.18 12:03:39 +0530