SRI PRASAD T G v. DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES
WP/23530/2023 · 2025-10-09
E S Indiresh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41239 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41239 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39757 WP NO.23530 OF 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 09TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.23530 OF 2023 (GM-CFA) BETWEEN:
SRI. PRASAD T.G.
S/O T. GOPAL KRISHNA, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT FLAT NO.601, 6TH FLOOR, NIRADAVAS APARTMENT, NANTURU PADAVU, MANGALURU - 575 005.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. S.V. SURYAVANSHI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES AND DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF CHIT FUNDS, MANGALURU, DAKSHINA KANNADA DISTRICT - 575 002.
2.
M/S NAVACHETANA CHITS CO. PVT. LTD.
MANGALURU BRANCH, 1ST FLOOR, BEAUTY PLAZA BUILDING, BALMATTA ROAD, MANGALURU - 575 001.
REP. BY ITS FOREMAN, SRI. YATHISH, MANGALURU.
3.
SUDHEER B.S.
S/O B. SHANTHARAM, AGE: MAJOR, R/AT NO.2-142G2E,
Digitally signed by SHARMA ANAND CHAYA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39757 WP NO.23530 OF 2023
SRI. SANNIDHI KRISHNA NAGARA, 3RD CROSS ROAD, KUMPALA, SARALAYA GUDDE, SOMESHWARA VILLAGE, KOTEKAR POST, DAKSHINA KANNADA - 575 022.
4. RAJESHA S/O KANTHAPPA SHETTY, AGE: MAJOR, R/AT HOUSE NO.G 5-48, KATIPALLA, MANGALURU - 575 030.
5. SUNDAR S/O THALYA, AGE: MAJOR, R/AT HOUSE NO.3-1-134, MUNICIPALITY AREA NO.3, UDUPI - 576 101. …RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET- ASIDE THE AWARD DATED 18TH APRIL, 2017 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 IN DISPUTE NO.132/2016-17 VIDE ANNEXURE-A; AND ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S. INDIRESH
ORAL ORDER
There is no representation for the petitioner.
2. This petition is of the year-2023 and listed for fifth time for non-compliance of office objections.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:39757 WP NO.23530 OF 2023
3. Despite having been granted sufficient time,
learned counsel for the petitioner failed to comply with the office objections. This non-compliance by the petitioner would indicate that the petitioner has no genuine intent to diligently pursue the matter.
4. Accordingly, writ petition stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections.
SD/- (E.S. INDIRESH) JUDGE
ARK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 21