1 2025:CGHC:39507 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 558 of 2022 Smt. Laxmi Dubey W/o. Late Shailendra Dubey Aged About 40 Years Permanent R/o Village-Kandarka, Tahsil-Dhamdha, Distt.-Durg (C.G.) Present R/o Behind Saja Civil Court, Yadav Para, Ward No. 12, Tahsil-Saja, District-Bemetara (C.G.) ... Appellant versus 1 - Ashok Kumar S/o Late Khedu Prasad Dubey Aged About 58 Years Working At Janpad Panchayat Saja, R/o Ward No. 7, Near Hanuman Temple, Village And Tahsil-Saja, District-Bemetara (C.G.) 2 - Smt. Annapurna Bai D/o Late Khedu Prasad Dubey Aged About 52 Years W/o Laxman Prasad Sharma, R/o Sheetla Ward No. 19, In Front Of House Of Bharat Pandit And Beside House Of Jha Advocate, Kawardha, Tahsil And District- Kabirdham (Wrongly Mentioned As Kawardha) (C.G.) 3 - Smt. Prabha Bai D/o Late Khedu Prasad Dubey Aged About 50 Years W/o Sanjay Dubey Through Ramchand Dubey, R/o Gupta Para, Old Kachhari, Near Hanuman Temple Street, Kawardha, Tehsil And District- Kabirdham (Wrongly Mentioned As Kawardha) (C.G.) 4 - Smt. Kamla Bai D/o Late Khedu Prasad Dubey Aged About 48 Years W/o Raju Sharma, R/o Sheetla Ward No. 19, In Front Of House Of Bharat Pandit And Beside Hosue Of Jha Advocate, Kawardha, Tahsil And District- Kabirdham (Wrongly Mentioned As Kawardha) (C.G.) 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through-Collector, Bemetara, Tahsil And District-Bemetara (C.G.) ... Respondents For Appellant : Mr. Vaibhav A Goverdhan, Advocate For Respondent No.5/State : Ms. Mandvi Bharadwaj, Panel Lawyer (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order On Board BINI PRADEEP Digitally signed by BINI PRADEEP Date: 2025.08.08 15:22:01 +0530 2 07.8.2025 1. This second appeal has been preferred by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment and decree dated 22.9.2022 passed by District Judge, Bemetara, Distt. Bemetara (CG) in Civil Appeal No.2A/2022, upholding judgment and decree dated 24.01.2022 passed by Civil Judge Class-II, Saja, Distt. Bemetara in Civil Suit No.2A/2015. 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the appellant seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this appeal. 3. On due consideration, prayer is allowed and learned counsel for the appellant is permitted to withdraw this appeal. 4. Accordingly, this second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. 5. Records of the Courts below be returned forthwith. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Bini