Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK
W.P.(C) NO. 18110 OF 2025
Sunadhar Majhi …. Petitioner Mr. A. Acharya Advocate -versus-
1. State of Odisha
2. The Director (R & R)-cum-Joint Secretary, Department of Water Resources, Odisha
3. The Collector & District Magistrate, Nuapada
4. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, Lower Indra Irrigation Project, Nuapada
….
Opposite Parties Mr. Sabita Ranjan Pattanaik, A.G.A.
CORAM:
JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA
JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO
ORDER
Order No. 08.09.2025
03.
1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode.
2. Petitioner in this writ application prays for the following relief;
“It is therefore humbly prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to admit this Writ Petition, call for the record, issue notice to the Opp. Parties and after hearing the parties, issue appropriate writ(s) thereby directing the Opp. Party No. 2 to approve & sanction the R.A. benefits as per the proposal submitted by the Opp. Party No. 3, dated 06.12.2017 under Annexure 1 (Series) along with interest @ 15% per annum on the R.A. amount from the date of displacement till the date of actual payment and disburse the Rehabilitation Assistance amount with interest in favour of the petitioner within the time stipulated by this Hon'ble Court;
And further pass any other order(s)/direction(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, p. 2 And, for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.”
3. Mr. Acharya, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that in the meantime some relevant documents could be traced out by the Petitioner which are necessary for just adjudication of the Writ Petition. Hence, he prays for withdrawal of the Writ Petition seeking liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars.
4. Mr. Pattanaik, learned Additional Government Advocate submits that he does not have any objection to the prayer made.
5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner, this Court disposes of the Writ Petition as withdrawn with a liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh one with better particulars within a period of one month.
(K.R. Mohapatra)
Judge
(Savitri Ratho)
Subhalaxmi
Judge SAHOO