Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
105 IN TH
The Punjab
Civil Pancha District Rop
CORAM:
Present:
HARKESH
CM-181-CI
respondent allowed su para-2 of th representati
CM-182-CI
respondent allowed su para-2 of th IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR
RFA No. 507
Cross Objec
Date of Deci unjab State and another
Versus
anchayat, Kambali, Tehsil Mohali, t Ropar and others
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HAR
Mr. Gunjan Mehta, Additional
for the appellants. Mr. Maninder Singh Garcha, S
Ms. Mehak Kanwar, Advocate,
for the PUDA/GMADA
Mr. Raj Kumar Rathore, Advoc
for cross-objector/respondent N ****
KESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) CI-2025 in Cross Objection No. 5
Application for impleading th ndent No. 3 (Chuhar Singh), who subject to all just exceptions. of the application are ordered to be entatives of respondent No. 3 so as t
Registry to do the needful. CI-2025 in Cross Objection No. 5
Application for impleading th ndent No. 12 (Harbans Singh), wh subject to all just exceptions. T of the application are ordered to be
UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 507 of 2001 (O&M) with Objection No. 5 of 2025 (O&M) f Decision: 04.05.2026
...Appellants
...Respondents
HARKESH MANUJA ional Advocate General, Punjab ha, Sr. Advocate, assisted by ocate, Advocate dent Nos. 3 to 8, 10 & 12. No. 5 of 2025 ing the legal representatives of who died on 22.02.2022, is ns. The persons mentioned in to be brought on record as legal o as to pursue the appeal. No. 5 of 2025 ing the legal representatives of ), who died on 02.09.2013, is ns. The persons mentioned in to be brought on record as legal
DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.06 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document
RFA No. 507 of 2001 (O&M) with Cross Objection No. 5 of 2025 (O&M) -2- representatives of respondent No. 12 so as to pursue the appeal. Amended memo of parties is taken on record. Registry to do the needful.
MAIN APPEAL / CROSS OBJECTION
At the outset, learned counsel(s) for the appellant(s) as well as GMADA submit(s) that the present appeal is squarely covered by the judgment dated 05.11.2009 passed by this Court in a bunch of appeals, lead case of which was RFA No. 2378 of 2000, titled “State of Punjab Versus Gurdial Chand and others”, whereby the appeals preferred at the instance of landowners as well as by the State were dismissed, while maintaining the determination of the market value by the learned Reference Court. [2] On the other hand,
learned counsel for the respondents/cross-objectors is not in a position to controvert the above factual position. [3] After going through the judgment passed in Gurdial Chand’s case (supra) as well as the facts of the present case, this Court agrees with the assertion of the learned counsel for the appellant(s)/GMADA. [4] Consequently, the present appeal and cross-objections are dismissed in the same terms as Gurdial Chand’s case (supra). [5] Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, shall stand(s) disposed off. May 04, 2026
( HARKESH MANUJA ) ‘dk kamra’
JUDGE
DINESH KUMAR 2026.05.06 09:41 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document