SATYPAL YADAV SON OF SHRI BODAN RAM v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/16231/2025 · 2025-10-17
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41227 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41227 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:42713] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16231/2025
1. Satypal Yadav Son Of Shri Bodan Ram, Aged About 49 Years, Resident Of Bhojpuri, Mundawar, Jalwas, District Alwar, (Raj.). 2. Hansraj Son Of Shri Tara Chand, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Mosaranpur, Gothra, District Alwar, (Raj.). 3. Jitendra Singh Son Of Shri Mohan Lal, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Village Saranwas Pahadwas, Tehsil Kotkasim, District Alwar, (Raj.). 4. Vijay Singh Son Of Shri Sher Singh, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Dhani Jharda Ki, Village Papra Kalan, Tehsil Udaipurwati, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 5. Abhay Singh Son Of Shri Laxman Prasad, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Village Shyopur Garhi, Tehsil Mundawar, District Alwar (Raj.). 6. Manjeet Singh Son Of Shri Suren Singh, Aged About 40 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 3, Mev Mohlla, Po Naswari, Tehsil Laxmangarh, District Alwar, (Raj.). 7. Nand Kishor Son Of Shri Ramkishan, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 7, Eshika Ka Bas, Jayal Kathoti, Po Jael, District Nagaur (Raj.). 8. Mohommad Shakir Son Of Shri Abdul Rsool, Aged About 45 Years, Resident Of Sadar Ki Gali, Chatikana Bazar, Karauli, (Raj.). 9. Vaqar Ahmed Khan, Son Of Shri Iftkhar Ahmed Khan, Aged About 44 Years, Resident Of Munshi Sadi Ki Gali, Ward No. 29, Dholikhar, Karauli, (Raj.). 10. Vikash Son Of Shri Narayan Ram, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of Dhani Dabri, Village Dabri Baloda, Tehsil Nawalgarh, District Jhunjhunu (Raj.). 11. Khinwraj Khichar Son Of Shri Devaram Modaram Khichar, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Khichado Ka Bas, Sindhlas, District Nagaur (Raj.). 12. Mahender Singh Saini Son Of Shri Murlidhar Saini, Aged About 47 Years, Resident Of Village Dhandhela, Tehsil Patan, District Sikar (Raj.). 13. Hazari Lal Son Of Shri Mula Ram, Aged About 48 Years, Resident Of Ward No. 3, Dhani Birkhudi Agwari, Ranasar, Tehsil Neem Ka Thana District Sikar (Raj.). ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary, Department Of Medial And Health And Family Welfare Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Directorate, Jaipur (Raj.)
[2025:RJ-JP:42713] (2 of 4) [CW-16231/2025]
3. The Additional Director, (Administration), Medical And Health Department, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
4. The Mission Director (Nhm) Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
5.
The Additional Mission Director (Nhm) Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.)
6. The Project Director (Nhm) Directorate Of Medical, Health And Family Welfare Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sunil Kumar Saini For Respondent(s) : Mr. Hamir Singh for Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 17/10/2025
1. Instant writ petition is preferred by petitioners with following prayer:
“It is, therefore, requested that Your Lordship would be pleased to accept and allow this writ petition and by issuing an appropriate writ, order or direction Quash and set aside the action of the respondents in reducing the number of posts of Nurse Grade-II (GNM) from 6172 to 3704, being arbitrary, illegal and violative of Articles 14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and Direct the respondents to consider and fill up all 6172 posts of Nurse Grade-II (GNM) as advertised 08.08.2007, including the remaining 2500 posts which were arbitrarily
reduced;
and
[2025:RJ-JP:42713] (3 of 4) [CW-16231/2025] Direct the respondents to consider the candidature of the petitioners, who are duly qualified and had participated in counselling, for appointment against the posts of Nurse Grade-II (GNM), strictly in accordance with law or may kindly be pleased
to
decide
the writ petition in the light of case of D.B.
Special
Appeal
(Writ) No.
414/2019,
titled
as State of Raj. and Ors. Versus Suresh Kumar
and
Ors.
decided
on 15.09.2025
by
Hon'ble Rajasthan High Court Jodhpur in the larger interest of justice.”
2.
Learned counsel for petitioners while referring and relying upon judgment dated 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 Suresh Kumar and Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and Ors. submits that the controversy and the issue raised herein is already settled by a Co-ordinate Bench at Principal Seat, Jodhpur and judgment is approved by Hon’ble Division Bench in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 State of Rajasthan and Ors. Vs. Suresh Kumar and Ors. on 15.09.2025. He further submitted that instant writ petition be disposed of in accordance with
judgment dated 19.12.2018 and affirmed on 15.09.2025.
3. Mr. Hamir Singh, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Archit Bohra, AGC accepts notice.
4. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for petitioners and also material placed on record, the writ petition may be disposed of in light of judgment dated
[2025:RJ-JP:42713] (4 of 4) [CW-16231/2025] 19.12.2018 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.14497/2017 and partly modified on dated 15.09.2025 in D.B. Special Appeal Writ No.414/2019 by Hon’ble Division Bench of this Court at Principal Seat, Jodhpur.
5. Considered the grievance raised herein, the petitioners are given a liberty to submit a representation to the respondents-Authority within a period of 15 days raising all grounds and the respondents-Authority are directed to decide the representation in light of judgment referred hereinabove with a reasoned and speaking order within a period of 30 days from date of receipt of representation. After passing the order, the respondents are under an obligation to communicate the order to the petitioners either by way of speed post or through E-mail, if petitioners have provided E-mail in their representation. If the petitioners are still aggrieved, they have liberty to approach this Court with fresh petition.
6. With the aforesaid directions, the present writ petition with pending application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /203