225 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1538-2001 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.07.2025 Shanti Devi ......Appellant Vs. Haryana State Electricity Board and another ......Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellant. Mr. Mayank Vashishth, Advocate, for Mr. Prateek Mahajan, Advocate, for the respondents. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (ORAL) 1. This case pertains to the year 2001. On the last date of hearing, since no one had put in appearance on behalf of the appellant, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellant as well as her counsel about the next date of hearing. 2. As per report of the Registry, appellant has been duly served. 3. Despite service, none has put in appearance on behalf of the appellant. It seems that the appellant is no more interested in pursuing the matter. Therefore, this Court has no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. 4. Accordingly, the present appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. 5. Pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) JUDGE 31.07.2025 Virender Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VIRENDRA SINGH ADHIKARI 2025.08.02 12:06 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document