[2025:RJ-JP:51787] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16894/2025 1. Sunil S/o Shri Lakhmichand, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Khoyada Karmali, Police Station Nauganwa, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar). 2. Banesingh S/o Shri Ramkishan, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Khoyada Karmali, Police Station Nauganwa, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar). 3. Altaf S/o Shri Kasam, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Khoyada Karmali, Police Station Nauganwa, District Alwar (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Alwar). ----Applicants Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicants(s) : Mr.Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA Order 19/12/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed by the applicants Sunil S/o Shri Lakhmichand, Banesingh S/o Shri Ramkishan and Altaf S/o Shri Kasam, arrested by the police in connection with the FIR bearing No.395/2025 dated 17.11.2025 registered at Police Station Nauganwa, District Alwar for the offences punishable under Sections 111(2)(a), 319(2), 318(4), 336(3), 340(2), 316(2) of B.N.S. and Section 66D of the IT Act. The bail application of the applicants was rejected by the Sessions Judge, Alwar vide order [2025:RJ-JP:51787] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-16894/2025] dated 11.12.2025, thereafter, the applicants have preferred this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicants have no criminal antecedents of similar nature and they have committed the alleged offence under the influence of greed, however, they have no such track record in the past. Learned counsel submits that the allegations against them are in respect of selling Natraj Pencils through online mode, where they take money for selling said pencils. Apart from that there are no other allegations. In view of the above fact, learned counsel submits that the accused-applicants may be enlarged on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application and submits that the present applicants may not be enlarged on bail. 4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case, and noticing the fact that the applicants have no such criminal record, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- applicants on bail. 5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-applicants - Sunil S/o Shri Lakhmichand, Banesingh S/o Shri Ramkishan and Altaf S/o Shri Kasam shall be released on bail, provided each of them executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of learned trial Court for their appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The applicants [2025:RJ-JP:51787] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-16894/2025] are further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case. (RAVI CHIRANIA),J Ravi/352