APHC010028502022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1788/2022 BETWEEN: NARIPEDDI RAMACHANDRA RAO, THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: 1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. GP FOR REVENUE 3. PHANINDRA KUMAR 4. MATTEGUNTA.SUDHIR,STANDING COUNSEL FOR Z.P.PS,M.P.PS,GRAM PANCHAYATS The Court made the following: The short grievance of the petitioner are trying to demolish and evict the petitioner from his agricultura including the Barn House, which is erected in his agricultural land for the purpose of harvesting the Tobacoo admeasuring Ac-3.00 cents i.e., (ii) An extent of Ac.1-75 cents in Sy.No.56/2A IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THE THIRD DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1788/2022 NARIPEDDI RAMACHANDRA RAO, ...PETITIONER AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENT(S) COUNSEL FOR THE PETITIONER: K V ADITYA CHOWDARY COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT(S): PHANINDRA KUMAR CHENNUPATI MATTEGUNTA.SUDHIR,STANDING COUNSEL FOR Z.P.PS,M.P.PS,GRAM PANCHAYATS The Court made the following: grievance of the petitioner is that the respondent are trying to demolish and evict the petitioner from his agricultura , which is erected in his agricultural land for the of harvesting the Tobacoo in an extent of Ac.0-10 cents out of 00 cents i.e., (i) An extent of Ac.1-25 cents in Sy 75 cents in Sy.No.56/2A of Kumkupadu Village IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI ...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT(S) is that the respondent Nos.5 & 6 are trying to demolish and evict the petitioner from his agricultural land , which is erected in his agricultural land for the 10 cents out of Sy.No.56/1C, Kumkupadu Village Panchayat Area, Addanki Mandal, Markapuram Division, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh, without following law. 2. Heard Sri K.V.Aditya Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Krishna Praneeth, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 3. Sri K.V.Aditya Chowdary, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that pursuant to the filing of the writ petition, the Barn House was already demolished and the same was done without issuing any notice though writ petition is pending and contended that he needs to file amendment application seeking damages. 4. This Court, in writ jurisdiction cannot adjudicate the damages caused for the petitioner. The petitioner can avail other appropriate remedy before the appropriate forum. Giving liberty to the said effect, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 3rd January, 2025 TJN 202 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 1788/2022 Dated:03.01.2025 TJN HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH WRIT PETITION NO: 1788/2022 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 04. 03.01.2025 RC, J The Writ Petition is closed. (Vide separate order) ______ RC, J TJN