HARIKESH S/O SORAAJ @ SHIVRAJ v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/16914/2025 · 2025-12-19
Ravi Chirania
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41219 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41219 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:51758] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 16914/2025 Harikesh S/o Soraaj @ Shivraj, Aged About 18 Years, Aged About 18 Year 8 Months, R/o Bagdoli, Police Station Bonli, Dis- trict Sawai Madhopur. (Accused Confined In District Jail At Sawaimadhopur). ----Applicant Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Applicant(s) : Mr.Rajendra Singh Tanwar For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vijay Singh Yadav, P.P.
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI CHIRANIA
Order 19/12/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed by the applicant Harikesh S/o Soraaj @ Shivraj, aged about 18 years, in connection with the FIR bearing No.411/2025 dated 21.11.2025 registered at Police Station Bonli District Sawaimadhopur for the offences punishable under Sections 319(2), 318(4) and 111(2) (b) of B.N.S. and Section 13 of the RPGO Act and Section 66 C and 66D of the IT Act. The bail application of the applicant was rejected by the Court of Session Judge, Sawaimadhopur vide order dated 28.11.2025, thereafter, the applicant has preferred this bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S.
2.
Learned counsel submits that the applicant is a young boy who is involved in this case under the influence of greed. Learned counsel submits that no similar case was pending against the ap- plicant in the past and no recovery was required to be made. In
[2025:RJ-JP:51758] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-16914/2025] view of the above facts, learned counsel submits that the accused- applicant may be enlarged on bail.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor strongly opposed the bail application by submitting that there is a complaint against the applicant on the 1930 portal in respect of a past incident, and therefore, the present applicant may not be enlarged on bail.
4. Considering the overall facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegations, this Court is inclined to exercise its power under Section 483 B.N.S.S. and deems it just and proper to enlarge the accused- applicant on bail.
5. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that accused-applicant - Harikesh S/o Soraaj @ Shivraj shall be released on bail, pro- vided he executes a personal bond in a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sound and solvent sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satis- faction of learned trial Court for his appearance before that Court on each and every date of hearing and whenever called upon to do so till the completion of the trial. The applicant is further directed not to take undue advantage of liberty or misuse liberty. It is made clear that the observation as made by this Court in the bail application will not affect the trial of the case.
6. In case the applicant is found to be involved in another case within two years from the date of passing of this order, the Investigating Officer/Public Prosecutor shall be at liberty to file cancellation of the bail application.
(RAVI CHIRANIA),J Monika/362