[2025:RJ-JP:21042] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2966/2025 1. Rahul S/o Mukesh, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Beelauth, Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 2. Vimal S/o Mukesh, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Beelauth, Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 3. Veerandra S/o Bhuri Singh, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Beelauth, Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 4. Teekendra S/o Jeet Singh, Aged About 42 Years, R/o Beelauth, Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 5. Malkhan S/o Udaybhan, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Beelauth, Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. 6. Neelesh S/o Omprakash, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Beelauth, Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ---Accused-Petitioners Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent 2. Bhoopendra S/o Bhavar Singh, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Dahara, Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan. ----Complainant-Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Bhardwaj For Respondent(s) : Ms. Tanushree Kaul Ms. Pooja Dixit Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, P.P. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 19/05/2025 1. This petition under Section 528 of BNSS is filed, with a prayer to quash the FIR No.123/2023 registered at Police Station Lakhanpur, District Bharatpur for offence under Sections 143, 323, 341, 336, 379, 427, 504 and 506 of IPC, on the basis of [2025:RJ-JP:21042] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-2966/2025] compromise effectuated between the parties herein, in respect of their inter-se dispute. 2. Learned counsel for both the parties, in presence of their respective clients, have submitted that the dispute at hand is inter-se private in nature, which has been resolved by the parties amicably. 3. Heard and considered. 4. At the outset, this Court deems it appropriate to place reliance upon the judgment passed by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab [(2012) 10 SCC 303] and Ramgopal Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh reported in [2022 (14) SCC 531], relevant portion of which is reproduced below: “12. The High Court, therefore, having regard to the nature of the offence and the fact that parties have amicably settled their dispute and the victim has willingly consented to the nullification of criminal proceedings, can quash such proceedings in exercise of its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C., even if the offences are non- compoundable.” 5. In view of the position of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in aforementioned case, and considering the personal nature of dispute, which has been amicably settled between parties, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the present misc. petition. Compromise is taken on record. 6. Considering the aforementioned, the present criminal miscellaneous petition is allowed and the FIR No.123/2023 [2025:RJ-JP:21042] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-2966/2025] registered at Police Station Lakhanpur District Bharatpur with all consequential proceedings, are hereby quashed and set aside. 7. Accordingly, the instant petition is allowed. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J GAURAV/110