1 2025:CGHC:23273 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 8968 of 2019 1 - Jitendra Kumar Sahu S/o Shri B.S. Sahu Aged About 50 Years Deputy Commissioner ( Development ) , Panchayat And Rural Development, Vidhan Nagar, Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Additional Chief Secretary, Department Of Panchayat, And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Principal Secretary, Department Of General Administration, Chhattisgarh, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Through The Secretary, Chhattisgarh Public Service Commission, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Khetrapal, Adv. For Respondents No. 1 and 2 : Mr. Ritesh Giri, Panel lawyer For Respondent No. 3 : Dr. Sudeep Agrawal, Adv. (Hon’ble Mr. Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi, J) Order on Board 11/06/2025 1. Petitioner has preferred this writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking following reliefs :- “i. That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ/order/direction, thereby directing the respondent authorities to conduct review D.P.C. as per proposal of the respondent no. 1 Digitally signed by AVANISH KUMAR PATHAK Date: 2025.06.13 11:00:49 +0530 2 department for consideration of case of petitioner for promotion to the post of Joint Commissioner. ii. Cost of the petition may also be granted to the petitioner. Iii. Any other relief, which this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper, may also kindly be granted to the petitioner, in the interest of justice.” 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 3. During the course of arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, he wants to raise his grievance by making a representation before the respondent authorities, as, in note sheet of the department of respondents No. 1 and 2, grade of petitioner has been considered to be upgraded as “Excellent”. Therefore, He prays that, the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw this petition with the liberty to file representation before the respondent authorities. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submits that, they have no objection to allow the aforesaid prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner. 5. On due consideration, the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed and this petition is disposed of as withdrawn with the liberty to the petitioner, as prayed for. If the petitioner submits representation raising his grievance, as raised in this petition, before the respondent authorities, then they are directed to consider and decide the same expeditiously in accordance with law. Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) JUDGE Pathak