PAWAN KUMAR CHANDEL S/O ANANADILAL CHANDEL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/972/2025 · 2025-01-22
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4121 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 4121 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:3051] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 972/2025 Pawan Kumar Chandel S/o Ananadilal Chandel, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Banwada Police Station Peeplu District Tonk (Raj.) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Aklera District Jhalawar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rohit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. S.R. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 22/01/2025
1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 BNSS on behalf of accused-petitioner. The petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.175/2024 registered at Police Station Ghantoli, District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21, 25 and 29 of NDPS Act.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the recovery of contraband articles containing 50 grams of smack were effected from the possession of other co- accused Suresh, apart from the disclosure statement of the co- accused, there are no other reliable evidence of the record to show that the accused-petitioner was involved in the transportation of the contraband articles. The accused-petitioner is in custody since long and trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be allowed.
[2025:RJ-JP:3051] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-972/2025]
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application and contended that the accused-petitioner is a habitual offender and against him two IPC cases under Section 379 of IPC have been registered, therefore, considering the criminal antecedents of the accused-petitioner, the bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused the material available on record.
5. Considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the petitioner and looking to the overall facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail.
6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 BNSS is allowed and it is ordered that the accused-petitioner Pawan Kumar Chandel S/o Ananadilal Chandel in connection with FIR No.175/2024 registered at Police Station Ghantoli, District Jhalawar shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Keshav/27