[2025:RJ-JP:41037] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5766/2025 Sujansingh S/o Lalchand, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Pathriya Police Station Aklera District Jhalawar(Raj) (At Present Confined In Sub District Jail Aklera District Jhalawar(Raj) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Karishma Pareek, Adv. Mr. Bhuvaneshwari, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rhishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP with Mr. Rajendra Singh Shekhawat, PP Mr. Gaurav Gupta, AGA Mr. Ayush Bamboriya, Adv. HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Order 09/10/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of accused-applicant. The accused-applicant was arrested in connection with FIR No.519/2024 registered at Police Station Aklera District Jhalawar for the offence(s) under Sections 103(1) of BNS and rejected in under Sections 103(3), 115(2), 126(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the accused-applicant submits that the applicant is aged approximately 25 years and is the sole bread earner of his family. It is submitted that the applicant has been in custody ever-since 01.11.2024. It is further submitted that PW-6 has turned hostile and PW-2 has not fully supported the prosecution's story. [2025:RJ-JP:41037] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-5766/2025] 3. Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor and counsel for the complainant have strongly opposed the bail application. It is submitted that the offence is heinous in nature, involving injuries caused by a sharp weapon with multiple wounds. It is further submitted that one of the injured persons has succumbed to injuries, while another has sustained multiple injuries. The medical report as confirmed by the Medical Board attributes the cause of death to be a head injury. It is also submitted that a blunt weapon was recovered. 4. Considered the arguments advanced by the counsel for the complainant; and the fact that an offence of heinous nature is alleged; that the death of one person is caused by a blunt weapon and the recovery of the said weapon, this Court is not inclined to entertain the bail application. 5. Accordingly, the bail application is dismissed. (SAMEER JAIN),J CHANDAN /21