Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41206 (KAR)

SRI PREETHAM SHETTY v. BANK OF INDIA

WP/9918/2022 · 2025-11-25

E S Indiresh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48684 WP No. 9918 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH WRIT PETITION NO.9918 OF 2022 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN: 1. SRI PREETHAM SHETTY S/O SRI M SADASHIV AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS R/A NO.7/116/2 SHREESHA VOKAMMA COMPOUND NEAR NAGABRAMHA CHAVADI KODICAL MANGALURU-5750006. 2. SMT. SUNEETHA W/O SRI M. SADASHIV AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS R/A NO.7/116/2 SHREESHA VOKAMMA COMPOUND NEAR NAGABRAMHA CHAVADI KODICAL MANGALURU-5750006. …PETITIONERS (BY SMT. DEEPIKA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. RAJASHEKAR S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. BANK OF INDIA Digitally signed by ARUNKUMAR M S Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48684 WP No. 9918 of 2022 NO.11, K G ROAD BENGALURU-560009 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER AND AUTHORISED OFFICER. 2. THE BRANCH MANAGER BANK OF INDIA K S RAO ROAD POST BOX NO.163 HAMPANAKATTA MANGALURU-575001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. M MOHAMED IBRAHIM, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO THE IMPUGNED E-AUCTION SALE NOTICE DATED 20.4.2022 ISSUED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 - BANK VIDE ANNEXURE-A. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH ORAL ORDER Heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. In this writ petition, the petitioners have challenged the impugned E-auction Sale Notice dated - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:48684 WP No. 9918 of 2022 20.04.2022 issued by respondent -Bank vide Annexure-A. 3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent-Bank that the writ petition does not survive for consideration as the loan account of the petitioner has been regularised. In that view of the matter, E-auction Sale Notice has not been given effect to. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of the above observation. SD/- (E.S.INDIRESH) JUDGE SB List No.: 2 Sl No.: 2