Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41204 (KAR)

SMT DHANALASMI @ GEETHA v. THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER

MFA/1077/2018 · 2025-07-17

C M Joshi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.M. JOSHI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1077 OF 2018 BETWEEN 1 . SMT DHANALAKSMI @ GEETHA W/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS, 2 . SACHIN S/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 20 YEARS, 3 . MASTER DHANUSH S/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY SMT.DHANALAKSHMI @ GEETHA, W/O LATE KALEGOWDA, BEING NATURAL MOTHER AS GUARDIAN, ALL ARE R/O LAXMIDEVARAHALLI, DHANALAKSHMI ESTATE, SULEKERE POST, KASABA HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK. ……..Appellants (By Sri. H.T.JAGADEESH, Advocate) AND: 1 . THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER K.S.R.T.C. MFA.No.1077/2018 -------------------------- 2 CHIKKAMAGALORE DIVISION, CHIKKAMAGALORE. 2 . SMT LAKSHMAMMA W/O LATE GIDDEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS, R/O LAXMIDEVARAHALLI, DHANALAXMI ESTATE, SULEKERE HOBLI, KASABA HOBLI, ARSIKERE TALUK. 3 . SMT GOWRAMMA W/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS, 4 . LOKESHWARI @ RANI D/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, 5 . PRAVEEN KUMAR S/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, 6 . RAGHU S/O KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, RESPONDENT NOS.3 TO 6 ARE R/O DASEGOWDA STREET KOTE, HOLENARASHIPURA, HASSAN DISTRICT. 7 . SAROJAMMA W/O LATE KALEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, R/O AKKANAPURA VILLAGE, KATTYA HOBLI, HASSAN DISTRICT. …Respondents MFA.No.1077/2018 -------------------------- 3 This Miscellaneous First Appeal filed under Section 173(1) of MV Act against the Judgment and Award dated 22.10.2012 passed in MVC No.84/2010 on the file of the Senior Civil Judge, JMFC and Member, MACT, Arsikere, partly allowing the claim petition for compensation and seeking enhancement of compensation. This Miscellaneous First Appeal is coming on for Orders this day, the Court made the following: ORAL ORDER Needful to be done within two weeks, failing which, the appeal stands dismissed without further reference to the Court. Sd/- JUDGE NOTE: Court Order dt.17.07.2025 not complied with. Hence Appeal stands dismissed. COPY Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T By : MK R By : RM C By : STE