VINEET KUMAR v. ANAMIKA SINGH, DIRECTOR GENERAL- SCHOOL GOVT OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
CAPL/4808/2021 · 2025-02-16
Salil Kumar Rai
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41204 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41204 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:22715 Court No. - 1 Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 4808 of 2021 Applicant :- Vineet Kumar Opposite Party :- Anamika Singh, Director General- School Govt Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Siddharth Khare,Sr. Advocate Counsel for Opposite Party :- Vijai Kumar Srivastava,Yatindra Hon'ble Salil Kumar Rai,J. In pursuance to the previous order passed by this Court, Shri Brijesh Dubey, the Standing Counsel on behalf of Sri Yatindra, the counsel representing the opposite parties states that after the order dated 28.05.2024 passed by the Supreme Court in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No (s). 3942/2023, an order dated 03.07.2024 was passed by the District Basic Education Officer, Rampur permitting the petitioner / applicant to join in the concerned institution. It has been stated that in view of the aforesaid, the order passed by the Writ Court has been complied. As the order passed by the Writ Court has been complied by the opposite party, no further orders are required to be passed in the present contempt application. The application is disposed of and consigned to records. Notice issued to the opposite party is discharged. However, in case, the statement given at the Bar on behalf of Sri Yatindra, the counsel representing the opposite parties is not correct or the applicant has not yet been permitted to join the concerned institution, the applicant shall be at liberty to file a recall application for recall of the present order or file a fresh contempt application. Order Date :- 17.2.2025 Vipasha Digitally signed by :- VIPASHA MUKHERJEE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad