Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 41203 (JHR)

JAI PRAKASH YADAV ALIAS PRAKASH YADAV v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8797/2025 · 2025-09-26

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:JHHC:30492] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No.8797 of 2025 ------ Jai Prakash Yadav @ Prakash Yadav, Aged about 44 years, S/O- Kameshwar Yadav, R/O- Ashakothi Khatal, P.O + P.S.- Madhuban, District- Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate Mr. Deepak Sahu, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vineet Kr. Vashistha, Spl.P.P ------ Order No.02 Dated-26-09-2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No.04 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Section 191(2), 191(3), 190, 121(2), 132, 127(1), 109(1) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 3 of Prevention of Damage of Public Property Act, 1984.. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was a member of an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of common object of the assembly, used criminal force against the public servant- police personnel and attempted to murder the police personnel by pelting stones; when the police went to their locality to investigate the dispute between two groups in connection with three cases. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 19.08.2025 as is evident from para-1 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the co-accused person, with similar allegations, has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 16.04.2025 passed in B.A. No.2984 of 2025. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-1st Class, Dhanbad in connection with Madhuban P.S. Case No.04 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated:- 26.09.2025 Saroj/