MUTHOOT FINCORP LIMITED THROUGH RAJESH SWAMINATH YADAV v. ASST INSPECTOR OF POLICE AND ANR
WP/3626/2025 · 2025-08-01
Shri Gautam Ashwin Ankhad, Shri Ravindra V Ghuge
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41203 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 41203 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Trupti 911-wp3626-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 3626 OF 2025 Muthoot Fincorp Limited … Petitioner versus Assistant Inspector of Police, Ratnagiri Police Station & Anr. … Respondents … Mr.Nitin Agrawal (through VC) with Mr.Ritik Gupta, Mr.Akash Palsamkar and Mr.Jayant Pagadala for the Petitioner. Mr.S.V.Gavand, Addl.PP for the Respondent -State. ...
CORAM :
RAVINDRA V. GHUGE &
GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, JJ.
DATE : 1st August, 2025 P.C.:-
1. This matter was heard for some time.
2. We have perused the prayers and Section 94 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
3. We have also perused the impugned notices dated 9th June, 2025 and 19th June, 2025.
4. We expressed our disinclination. 1/2 TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Digitally signed by TRUPTI SADANAND BAMNE Date: 2025.08.02 16:58:17 +0530
Trupti 911-wp3626-2025
5. The learned Advocate for the Petitioner submits, on instructions, that the Petitioner desires to withdraw this Petition.
6. In view of the above, this Writ Petition is disposed off as withdrawn, on instructions.
7. In the event the police authorities take any decision which is impermissible in law, the Petitioner would avail of a legal remedy. Needless to state, if the Petitioner has any cause of action arising from a subsequent event, it shall be at liberty to take appropriate legal steps.
(GAUTAM A. ANKHAD, J.) (RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) 2/2