Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Item.16
11.02.2025 ssi
Ct. 17
WPA 22226 of 2023
Sk. Anisul
-vs-
The State of W.B. & ors.
Mr. Mukteswar Maity
Ms. Manika Sarkar
…for the petitioner
Mr. Debasish Das
…for the respondent no.10
Mr. Soumitra Bandyopadhyay
Mr. Srinath Singha Roy
…for the State
As the application has been filed not by the aggrieved owner of land, but by a purported representative who merely relies on an unregistered private document regarding authorization, the same is not entertained.
However, the owner/s of the land shall be at liberty to file an appropriate application afresh, if they so desire in accordance with law.
With these observations, the writ petition is disposed of without any further order, even as to costs.
Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order be supplied to the parties, if applied for, as early as possible.
(Jay Sengupta, J.)