CRP.No.1560 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 16.04.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE P.T.ASHA C.R.P.No.1560 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.9122 of 2025 1.Padmavathy 2.Krishnaveni ...Petitioners Vs. 1.Muniyammal 2.Sendrayan 3.Gandhimathi 4.Thirupathi 5. Anbalagan 6.Chinnusamy 7.Gunasekaran 8.The District Collector, District Collector's Office, Salem -I, Salem District 1/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.No.1560 of 2025 9.The Revenue Divisional Officer, Salem, Revenue Divisional Office, Salem-5, Salem District. 10.The Tahsildar, Taluk Office, Manakkadu, Hasthampatti Salem-7, Salem District 11.The Village Administrative Officer, Ammapettai Rural Village, Ammapettai, Salem – 3, Salem District 12.The No.1 Joint Sub Registrar, Salem East, Integrated Registration Complex Near Kailash Manasarovar CBSE School, Ammapet, Salem-14, Salem District. 13.The District Registrar (Salem East) Integrated Registration Complex Near Kailash Manasarovar CBSE School, Ammapet, Salem-14, Salem District. ...Respondents PRAYER: Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, to set aside the Fair and Final orders dated 14.02.2025 passed in IA.No.2 of 2024 in OS.No.671 of 2023 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Salem. 2/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.No.1560 of 2025 For Petitioner : Mr.R.Nalliyappan For Respondent : M/s.F.Wellington for R.7 : M/s. R.Siddharth, AGP for R.8 to R.13. ORDER The Civil Revision Petition is filed to set aside the Fair and Final orders dated 14.02.2025 passed in IA.No.2 of 2024 in OS.No.671 of 2023 on the file of the I Additional District Judge, Salem. 2. The learned counsel for the 7th respondent is present. He would submit that the 7th respondent has nothing to do with the suit property. However, nowhere in the counter statement such a specific plea has been taken and on the contrary the entire counter proceeds on the merit challenging the rights of the plaintiffs. Therefore, the 7th respondent appears to be a necessary party to the proceedings. However, the official respondents, namely, respondents 8 to 13 are neither necessary nor proper parties to the proceedings in a suit for partition. 3/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.No.1560 of 2025 3. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is partly allowed. The order passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Salem in IA.No.2 of 2024 impleading official respondents, namely, respondents 8 to 13 in the suit OS.No.671 of 2023 is set aside. In all other respect the order passed by the learned I Additional District Judge, Salem in IA.No.2 of 2024 is confirmed. No costs. Consequently, the connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 16.04.2025 shr Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No Speaking Order/Non Speaking Order To The I Additional District Judge, Salem. 4/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRP.No.1560 of 2025 P.T.ASHA, J., shr C.R.P.No.1560 of 2025 and C.M.P.No.9122 of 2025 16.04.2025 5/5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis